From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pA825TMJ085357 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 20:05:29 -0600 Message-ID: <1320717928.3186.100.camel@doink> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: ignore fsstress file count for 022 From: Alex Elder Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 20:05:28 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1320699832-12693-1-git-send-email-wkendall@sgi.com> References: <1320699832-12693-1-git-send-email-wkendall@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Bill Kendall Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 15:03 -0600, Bill Kendall wrote: > The recently added fsstress operations result in a different > number of directories and files being created for xfsdump test > 022, which causes the test to fail since the expected xfsrestore > output records these numbers. Filter out the numbers to prevent > this from breaking in the future. > > Also increase the number of fsstress operations used to populate > the filesystem so that we get roughly the same number of > directories and files as we used to for this test. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Kendall Looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs