From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAHJgPHL069983 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:42:26 -0600 Message-ID: <1321558944.3015.6.camel@doink> Subject: Re: [patch] xfsprogs - workaround debian build daemon dependency resolution From: Alex Elder Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:42:24 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1321558138.3015.4.camel@doink> References: <1321558138.3015.4.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: aelder@sgi.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Nathan Scott Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 13:28 -0600, Alex Elder wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 20:39 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Workaround the Debian buildd dependency handling for libreadline5 library > > handling > > > > Evidently the buildd daemons process depenencies differently to local > > builds, and > > expect the first of optional dependencies to be resolved. Flip the > > ordering to match > > this dependency. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott > > Looks fine to me. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Elder > Actually, it *looked* fine superficially, but it's crap. Get in touch with me or Ben (bpm) on IRC so we can get this fixed and we'll cut a release with this included today. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs