From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nfs10.americas.sgi.com (nfs10.americas.sgi.com [128.162.245.67]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAUHwoSW208146 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:58:50 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: XFS update for 3.1-stable (resent) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:10:54 -0600 Message-Id: <1322676660-22945-1-git-send-email-bpm@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20111128214018.GB1650@kroah.com> References: <20111128214018.GB1650@kroah.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: greg@kroah.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: bpm@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Greg, The last mailing of this patch set went AWOL. Here's another whirl. Greg K-H wrote: > Was stable@vger.kernel.org on the to: line? If so, I should have seen them > through that, but I don't, which is worrysome to me. I thought so. > The 3.0 series is already in the last 3.0.11 release, so I don't need them, I > think I need the 3.1 patches, right? Affirmative. You only need the 3.1 patches, here they are: --- This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which are important for 3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1. My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y. Thanks! Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs