From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pBL08FLA199485 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:08:16 -0600 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZVot0xboBwx2FJma for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:08:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from disappointment ([192.168.1.1]) by dastard with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rd9ij-0000QO-U5 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:07:45 +1100 Received: from dave by disappointment with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rd9ij-0005bW-Mc for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:07:45 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: [PATCH 0/2]: xfs - fixes found with sparse checking Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:07:40 +1100 Message-Id: <1324426062-21505-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com There are a few minor issues. The first patch are all really just cleanups that don't change functionality. The second patch fixes a real bug that we need to consider backporting to stable releases. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs