From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, David Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] xfs: Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 00:32:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338935546-3914-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
Commit de1cbee which removed b_file_offset in favor of b_bn introduced a bug
causing xfs_buf_allocate_memory() to overestimate the number of necessary
pages. The problem is that xfs_buf_alloc() sets b_bn to -1 and thus effectively
every buffer is straddling a page boundary which causes
xfs_buf_allocate_memory() to allocate two pages and use vmalloc() for access
which is unnecessary.
Dave says xfs_buf_alloc() doesn't need to set b_bn to -1 anymore since the
buffer is inserted into the cache only after being fully initialized now.
So just make xfs_buf_alloc() fill in proper block number from the beginning.
CC: David Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 16 ++--------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index 172d3cc..a4beb42 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -201,14 +201,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc(
bp->b_length = numblks;
bp->b_io_length = numblks;
bp->b_flags = flags;
-
- /*
- * We do not set the block number here in the buffer because we have not
- * finished initialising the buffer. We insert the buffer into the cache
- * in this state, so this ensures that we are unable to do IO on a
- * buffer that hasn't been fully initialised.
- */
- bp->b_bn = XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL;
+ bp->b_bn = blkno;
atomic_set(&bp->b_pin_count, 0);
init_waitqueue_head(&bp->b_waiters);
@@ -567,11 +560,6 @@ xfs_buf_get(
if (bp != new_bp)
xfs_buf_free(new_bp);
- /*
- * Now we have a workable buffer, fill in the block number so
- * that we can do IO on it.
- */
- bp->b_bn = blkno;
bp->b_io_length = bp->b_length;
found:
@@ -772,7 +760,7 @@ xfs_buf_get_uncached(
int error, i;
xfs_buf_t *bp;
- bp = xfs_buf_alloc(target, 0, numblks, 0);
+ bp = xfs_buf_alloc(target, XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL, numblks, 0);
if (unlikely(bp == NULL))
goto fail;
--
1.7.1
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 22:32 Jan Kara [this message]
2012-06-20 6:39 ` [PATCH v2] xfs: Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory() Christoph Hellwig
2012-06-20 6:41 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338935546-3914-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox