From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/8] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:37:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1347302246-52710-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347302246-52710-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
This check is used in multiple places to determine whether we
should check for (and potentially free) post EOF blocks on an
inode. Add a helper to consolidate the check.
Note that when we remove an inode from the cache (xfs_inactive()),
we are required to trim post-EOF blocks even if the inode is marked
preallocated or append-only to maintain correct space accounting.
The 'force' parameter to xfs_can_free_eofblocks() specifies whether
we should ignore the prealloc/append-only status of the inode.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c | 19 +++++++------------
fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
index d883881..12f5087 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
@@ -435,11 +435,7 @@ xfs_release(
if (ip->i_d.di_nlink == 0)
return 0;
- if ((S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) &&
- (VFS_I(ip)->i_size > 0 ||
- (VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)) &&
- (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS)) &&
- (!(ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)))) {
+ if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, false)) {
/*
* If we can't get the iolock just skip truncating the blocks
@@ -515,13 +511,12 @@ xfs_inactive(
goto out;
if (ip->i_d.di_nlink != 0) {
- if ((S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) &&
- (VFS_I(ip)->i_size > 0 ||
- (VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)) &&
- (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) &&
- (!(ip->i_d.di_flags &
- (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)) ||
- ip->i_delayed_blks != 0))) {
+ /*
+ * force is true because we are evicting an inode from the
+ * cache. Post-eof blocks must be freed, lest we end up with
+ * broken free space accounting.
+ */
+ if (xfs_can_free_eofblocks(ip, true)) {
error = xfs_free_eofblocks(mp, ip, false);
if (error)
return VN_INACTIVE_CACHE;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h
index 447e146..f4e7ec8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
#ifndef _XFS_VNODEOPS_H
#define _XFS_VNODEOPS_H 1
+#include "xfs_bmap_btree.h"
+#include "xfs_dinode.h"
+#include "xfs_inode.h"
+
struct attrlist_cursor_kern;
struct file;
struct iattr;
@@ -9,8 +13,25 @@ struct iovec;
struct kiocb;
struct pipe_inode_info;
struct uio;
-struct xfs_inode;
+/*
+ * Test whether it is appropriate to check an inode for and free post EOF
+ * blocks. The 'force' parameter determines whether we should also consider
+ * regular files that are marked preallocated or append-only.
+ */
+static inline bool
+xfs_can_free_eofblocks(struct xfs_inode *ip, bool force)
+{
+ if (S_ISREG(ip->i_d.di_mode) &&
+ (VFS_I(ip)->i_size > 0 ||
+ (VN_CACHED(VFS_I(ip)) > 0 || ip->i_delayed_blks > 0)) &&
+ (ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) &&
+ (!(ip->i_d.di_flags & (XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC | XFS_DIFLAG_APPEND)) ||
+ (force && ip->i_delayed_blks != 0)))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
int xfs_setattr_nonsize(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct iattr *vap, int flags);
int xfs_setattr_size(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct iattr *vap, int flags);
--
1.7.7.6
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/8] speculative preallocation inode tracking Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] xfs: support a tag-based inode_ag_iterator Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2012-09-11 5:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode Dave Chinner
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] xfs: export xfs_free_eofblocks() and return EAGAIN on trylock failure Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] xfs: add enhanced filtering to EOFBLOCKS scan Brian Foster
2012-09-10 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] xfs: add background scanning to clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1347302246-52710-4-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox