From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/19] xfs: verify AGI blocks as they are read from disk
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:50:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349754670-32009-7-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349754670-32009-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Add an AGI block verify callback function and pass it into the
buffer read functions. Remove the now redundant verification code
that is currently in use.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
index 7c944e1..9311ae5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
@@ -1472,6 +1472,31 @@ xfs_check_agi_unlinked(
#define xfs_check_agi_unlinked(agi)
#endif
+static void
+xfs_agi_read_verify(
+ struct xfs_buf *bp)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
+ struct xfs_agi *agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(bp);
+ int agi_ok;
+
+ /*
+ * Validate the magic number of the agi block.
+ */
+ agi_ok = agi->agi_magicnum == cpu_to_be32(XFS_AGI_MAGIC) &&
+ XFS_AGI_GOOD_VERSION(be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_versionnum)) &&
+ be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_seqno) == bp->b_pag->pag_agno;
+ if (unlikely(XFS_TEST_ERROR(!agi_ok, mp, XFS_ERRTAG_IALLOC_READ_AGI,
+ XFS_RANDOM_IALLOC_READ_AGI))) {
+ XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR("xfs_read_agi", XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW,
+ mp, agi);
+ xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, EFSCORRUPTED);
+ }
+ xfs_check_agi_unlinked(agi);
+ bp->b_iodone = NULL;
+ xfs_buf_ioend(bp, 0);
+}
+
/*
* Read in the allocation group header (inode allocation section)
*/
@@ -1482,38 +1507,18 @@ xfs_read_agi(
xfs_agnumber_t agno, /* allocation group number */
struct xfs_buf **bpp) /* allocation group hdr buf */
{
- struct xfs_agi *agi; /* allocation group header */
- int agi_ok; /* agi is consistent */
int error;
ASSERT(agno != NULLAGNUMBER);
error = xfs_trans_read_buf(mp, tp, mp->m_ddev_targp,
XFS_AG_DADDR(mp, agno, XFS_AGI_DADDR(mp)),
- XFS_FSS_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, bpp, NULL);
+ XFS_FSS_TO_BB(mp, 1), 0, bpp, xfs_agi_read_verify);
if (error)
return error;
ASSERT(!xfs_buf_geterror(*bpp));
- agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(*bpp);
-
- /*
- * Validate the magic number of the agi block.
- */
- agi_ok = agi->agi_magicnum == cpu_to_be32(XFS_AGI_MAGIC) &&
- XFS_AGI_GOOD_VERSION(be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_versionnum)) &&
- be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_seqno) == agno;
- if (unlikely(XFS_TEST_ERROR(!agi_ok, mp, XFS_ERRTAG_IALLOC_READ_AGI,
- XFS_RANDOM_IALLOC_READ_AGI))) {
- XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR("xfs_read_agi", XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW,
- mp, agi);
- xfs_trans_brelse(tp, *bpp);
- return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
- }
-
xfs_buf_set_ref(*bpp, XFS_AGI_REF);
-
- xfs_check_agi_unlinked(agi);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 3:50 [PATCH 00/19] xfs: buffer read verifier infrastructure Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 01/19] xfs: growfs: don't read garbage for new secondary superblocks Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 02/19] xfs: make buffer read verication an IO completion function Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 03/19] xfs: uncached buffer reads need to return an error Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-11 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-12 2:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 04/19] xfs: verify superblocks as they are read from disk Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-11 22:28 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 05/19] xfs: verify AGF blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-09 3:50 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-10-11 21:43 ` [PATCH 06/19] xfs: verify AGI " Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 07/19] xfs: verify AGFL " Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-11 21:52 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:50 ` [PATCH 08/19] xfs: verify inode buffers " Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-11 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 09/19] xfs: verify btree blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 10/19] xfs: verify dquot " Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-11 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 11/19] xfs: add verifier callback to directorry read code Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 21:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 12/19] xfs: factor dir2 block read operations Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 13/19] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 14/19] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 15/19] xfs: factor out dir2 data " Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 16/19] xfs: factor dir2 leaf read Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 17/19] xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 18/19] xfs: add xfs_da_node verification Dave Chinner
2012-10-09 3:51 ` [PATCH 19/19] xfs: Add verifiers to dir2 data readahead Dave Chinner
2012-10-11 12:09 ` [PATCH 00/19] xfs: buffer read verifier infrastructure Mark Tinguely
2012-10-11 21:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349754670-32009-7-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox