public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 00/23] xfs: metadata verifiers V2
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:44:06 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350020669-19504-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)

Hi folks,

Second version of the buffer verifier series. The initial read
verifier infrastructure patch set and overview is described here:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00146.html

This version of the patch set introduces write verifiers and fixes
lots of bugs in the read verifiers.  The write verifiers also
pointed out a bug in the allocation btree block/freelist handling
where we are writing back freed buffers that are still on the AGF
freelist (and hence failing verification).

I haven't yet folded the recent review comments into the series - I
figured that I'd finish testing this version of the code before I
broke it again, so apart from bug fixes the read veridier part of
the series is identical to the original series.

Still to implement are:

- log recovery read/write verifiers
- uncached buffer write verifiers
- potentially separate some of the write verify patches; maybe the
  directory/attr modifications shoul dbein a separate patch as they
  are somewhat more complicated than just adding a callback to a
  buffer once it has been read/built.

These will be implemented for version 3 along with all the review
comments from the first version that have come in....

This version passes xfstests without regressions, works on 500TB
filesystems, complete various stress tests and benchmark runs, etc,
so is much more robust than the first version.

Cheers,

Dave.

--

Changes in Version 2:

- fixed use of xfs_dir2_db_t instead of xfs_dablk_t in directory and
  attr read functions (found when testing xfstests --large-fs on a
  500TB fs and attribute block numbers went beyond 32 bits). This
  mistake was copy-n-pasted several times.
- fixed use of "int map_type" instead of "xfs_daddr_t mappedbno" in
  directory and attr read functions.
- fixed incorrect logic in xfs_dir2_block_verify where a failed
  block check would not clear the block_ok flag correctly
- invalidate allocbt->freelist buffers so they don't get written
  after being freed and while still on the freelist
- added initial suppor for write verifiers.

  Write verifiers are similar to read verifiers, the are simply
  called just prior to issuing the IO on the buffer. The buffer is
  locked at this point, so we are guaranteed an unchanging buffer
  to work from.

  The initial write verifiers are simply the same as the read
  verifiers, except they don't have the ioend processing in them. A
  failure of the write verifier will cause the filesystem to shut
  down as writing invalid metadata to disk is a bad thing. The write
  verifier for the alloc btree blocks was what discovered the
  writing of freed allocbt blocks to disk from the free list.

  Eventually, the metadata CRC will be calculated in the write
  verifier after validating that the buffer contents are valid.


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-12  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-12  5:44 Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 01/23] xfs: growfs: don't read garbage for new secondary superblocks Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 02/23] xfs: invalidate allocbt blocks moved to the free list Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 03/23] xfs: make buffer read verication an IO completion function Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 04/23] xfs: uncached buffer reads need to return an error Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 05/23] xfs: verify superblocks as they are read from disk Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 06/23] xfs: verify AGF blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 07/23] xfs: verify AGI " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 08/23] xfs: verify AGFL " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 09/23] xfs: verify inode buffers " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 10/23] xfs: verify btree blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 11/23] xfs: verify dquot " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 12/23] xfs: add verifier callback to directorry read code Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 13/23] xfs: factor dir2 block read operations Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 14/23] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 15/23] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 16/23] xfs: factor out dir2 data " Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 17/23] xfs: factor dir2 leaf read Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 18/23] xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 19/23] xfs: add xfs_da_node verification Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 20/23] xfs: Add verifiers to dir2 data readahead Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 21/23] xfs: add buffer pre-write callback Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 22/23] xfs: add pre-write metadata buffer verifier callbacks Dave Chinner
2012-10-13 16:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-14  0:12     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-18  4:50       ` [PATCH 24/23] xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure Dave Chinner
2012-10-23 12:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-23 21:42           ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 23/23] xfs: connect up write verifiers to new buffers Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1350020669-19504-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox