public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] xfs: don't do IO when creating an new inode
Date: Tue,  7 May 2013 18:04:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367913876-30086-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367913876-30086-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

When we are allocating a new inode, we read the inode cluster off
disk to increment the generation number. We are already using a
random generation number for newly allocated inodes, so if we are not
using the ikeep mode, we can just generate a new generation number
when we initialise the newly allocated inode.

This avoids the need for reading the inode buffer during inode
creation. This will speed up allocation of inodes in cold, partially
allocated clusters as they will no longer need to be read from disk
during allocation. It will also reduce the CPU overhead of inode
allocation by not having the process the buffer read, even on cache
hits.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index efbe1ac..9a475d1 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -1028,6 +1028,11 @@ xfs_dinode_calc_crc(
 
 /*
  * Read the disk inode attributes into the in-core inode structure.
+ *
+ * If we are initialising a new inode and we are not utilising the
+ * XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP inode cluster mode, we can simple build the new inode core
+ * with a random generation number. If we are keeping inodes around, we need to
+ * read the inode cluster to get the existing generation number off disk.
  */
 int
 xfs_iread(
@@ -1047,6 +1052,22 @@ xfs_iread(
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 
+	/* shortcut IO on inode allocation if possible */
+	if ((iget_flags & XFS_IGET_CREATE) &&
+	    !(mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_IKEEP)) {
+		/* initialise the on-disk inode core */
+		memset(&ip->i_d, 0, sizeof(ip->i_d));
+		ip->i_d.di_magic = XFS_DINODE_MAGIC;
+		ip->i_d.di_gen = prandom_u32();
+		if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
+			ip->i_d.di_version = 3;
+			ip->i_d.di_ino = ip->i_ino;
+			uuid_copy(&ip->i_d.di_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
+		} else
+			ip->i_d.di_version = 2;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Get pointers to the on-disk inode and the buffer containing it.
 	 */
@@ -1133,17 +1154,16 @@ xfs_iread(
 	xfs_buf_set_ref(bp, XFS_INO_REF);
 
 	/*
-	 * Use xfs_trans_brelse() to release the buffer containing the
-	 * on-disk inode, because it was acquired with xfs_trans_read_buf()
-	 * in xfs_imap_to_bp() above.  If tp is NULL, this is just a normal
+	 * Use xfs_trans_brelse() to release the buffer containing the on-disk
+	 * inode, because it was acquired with xfs_trans_read_buf() in
+	 * xfs_imap_to_bp() above.  If tp is NULL, this is just a normal
 	 * brelse().  If we're within a transaction, then xfs_trans_brelse()
 	 * will only release the buffer if it is not dirty within the
 	 * transaction.  It will be OK to release the buffer in this case,
-	 * because inodes on disk are never destroyed and we will be
-	 * locking the new in-core inode before putting it in the hash
-	 * table where other processes can find it.  Thus we don't have
-	 * to worry about the inode being changed just because we released
-	 * the buffer.
+	 * because inodes on disk are never destroyed and we will be locking the
+	 * new in-core inode before putting it in the cache where other
+	 * processes can find it.  Thus we don't have to worry about the inode
+	 * being changed just because we released the buffer.
 	 */
  out_brelse:
 	xfs_trans_brelse(tp, bp);
-- 
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-07  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-07  8:04 [RFC, PATCH 0/7] xfs: new icreate transaction Dave Chinner
2013-05-07  8:04 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-05-07  8:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: xfs_ifree doesn't need to modify the inode buffer Dave Chinner
2013-05-07  8:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: Introduce an ordered buffer item Dave Chinner
2013-05-07  8:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: Inode create log items Dave Chinner
2013-05-07  8:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: Inode create transaction reservations Dave Chinner
2013-05-07  8:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: Use inode create transaction Dave Chinner
2013-05-07  8:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: Inode create item recovery Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1367913876-30086-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox