* [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
@ 2013-12-13 11:49 Zhi Yong Wu
2013-12-13 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhi Yong Wu @ 2013-12-13 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs; +Cc: Zhi Yong Wu
From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 00b655f..50b8a85 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -9542,7 +9542,6 @@ XFS FILESYSTEM
P: Silicon Graphics Inc
M: Dave Chinner <dchinner@fromorbit.com>
M: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
-M: xfs@oss.sgi.com
L: xfs@oss.sgi.com
W: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
T: git git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git
--
1.7.6.5
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
2013-12-13 11:49 [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file Zhi Yong Wu
@ 2013-12-13 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-13 20:27 ` Ben Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2013-12-13 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhi Yong Wu; +Cc: Zhi Yong Wu, xfs
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
2013-12-13 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2013-12-13 20:27 ` Ben Myers
2013-12-13 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2013-12-13 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Zhi Yong Wu, Zhi Yong Wu, xfs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:31:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good,
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Also discussed here:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00024.html
Before pulling this in we should probably let Dave give another 2c.
-Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
2013-12-13 20:27 ` Ben Myers
@ 2013-12-13 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-16 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2013-12-13 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Myers; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Zhi Yong Wu, Zhi Yong Wu, xfs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:27:47PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:31:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Looks good,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> Also discussed here:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00024.html
>
> Before pulling this in we should probably let Dave give another 2c.
Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely
nothing wrong with having xfs@oss.sgi.com listed as a maintainer;
different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
2013-12-13 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2013-12-16 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-06 20:16 ` Ben Myers
2014-01-06 21:57 ` Zhi Yong Wu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2013-12-16 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Zhi Yong Wu, Ben Myers, Zhi Yong Wu, xfs
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:01:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely
> nothing wrong with having xfs@oss.sgi.com listed as a maintainer;
> different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong.
I think life is much better if XFS follows the usual convention. We
already drill into submitters heads that they should send patches and
questions to the list for the whole kernel, and the angry behaviour of
many maintainers when they get personal mail helps with that, too.
Given that we already have maintainers names listed, and the list in the
proper field I also can't see what this should buy us.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
2013-12-16 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2014-01-06 20:16 ` Ben Myers
2014-01-06 21:57 ` Zhi Yong Wu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2014-01-06 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Zhi Yong Wu, Zhi Yong Wu, xfs
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 07:20:53AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:01:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely
> > nothing wrong with having xfs@oss.sgi.com listed as a maintainer;
> > different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong.
>
> I think life is much better if XFS follows the usual convention. We
> already drill into submitters heads that they should send patches and
> questions to the list for the whole kernel, and the angry behaviour of
> many maintainers when they get personal mail helps with that, too.
>
> Given that we already have maintainers names listed, and the list in the
> proper field I also can't see what this should buy us.
Either way is fine with me.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file
2013-12-16 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-06 20:16 ` Ben Myers
@ 2014-01-06 21:57 ` Zhi Yong Wu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zhi Yong Wu @ 2014-01-06 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Ben Myers, Zhi Yong Wu, xfstests
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:01:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely
>> nothing wrong with having xfs@oss.sgi.com listed as a maintainer;
>> different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong.
>
> I think life is much better if XFS follows the usual convention. We
I agree so, and guess that some guy will submit the same patch later.
We will have to roll back to this discussion again.
> already drill into submitters heads that they should send patches and
> questions to the list for the whole kernel, and the angry behaviour of
> many maintainers when they get personal mail helps with that, too.
>
> Given that we already have maintainers names listed, and the list in the
> proper field I also can't see what this should buy us.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Regards,
Zhi Yong Wu
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-06 21:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-13 11:49 [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file Zhi Yong Wu
2013-12-13 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-13 20:27 ` Ben Myers
2013-12-13 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-16 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-06 20:16 ` Ben Myers
2014-01-06 21:57 ` Zhi Yong Wu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox