From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:01:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1398315722-20870-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398315722-20870-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Currently xfs_db will claim the CRC on a structure is correct if the
buffer is not marked with an error. However, buffers may have been
read without a verifier, and hence have not had their CRCs
validated. in this case, we shoul dreport "unchecked" rather than
"correct". For example:
xfs_db> fsb 0x6003f
xfs_db> type dir3
xfs_db> p
dhdr.hdr.magic = 0x58444433
dhdr.hdr.crc = 0x2d0f9c9d (unchecked)
....
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
db/fprint.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
db/io.c | 2 ++
db/io.h | 12 +++++++++---
include/libxfs.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/db/fprint.c b/db/fprint.c
index 435d984..52782e2 100644
--- a/db/fprint.c
+++ b/db/fprint.c
@@ -206,7 +206,20 @@ fp_crc(
__int64_t val;
char *ok;
- ok = iocur_crc_valid() ? "correct" : "bad";
+ switch (iocur_crc_valid()) {
+ case -1:
+ ok = "unchecked";
+ break;
+ case 0:
+ ok = "bad";
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ ok = "correct";
+ break;
+ default:
+ ok = "unknown state";
+ break;
+ }
for (i = 0, bitpos = bit;
i < count && !seenint();
diff --git a/db/io.c b/db/io.c
index 5eb61d9..387f171 100644
--- a/db/io.c
+++ b/db/io.c
@@ -531,6 +531,8 @@ set_cur(
return;
iocur_top->buf = bp->b_addr;
iocur_top->bp = bp;
+ if (!ops)
+ bp->b_flags |= LIBXFS_B_UNCHECKED;
iocur_top->bb = d;
iocur_top->blen = c;
diff --git a/db/io.h b/db/io.h
index ad39bee..7875119 100644
--- a/db/io.h
+++ b/db/io.h
@@ -63,10 +63,16 @@ extern void set_cur(const struct typ *t, __int64_t d, int c, int ring_add,
bbmap_t *bbmap);
extern void ring_add(void);
-static inline bool
+/*
+ * returns -1 for unchecked, 0 for bad and 1 for good
+ */
+static inline int
iocur_crc_valid()
{
- return (iocur_top->bp &&
- iocur_top->bp->b_error != EFSBADCRC &&
+ if (!iocur_top->bp)
+ return -1;
+ if (iocur_top->bp->b_flags & LIBXFS_B_UNCHECKED)
+ return -1;
+ return (iocur_top->bp->b_error != EFSBADCRC &&
(!iocur_top->ino_buf || iocur_top->ino_crc_ok));
}
diff --git a/include/libxfs.h b/include/libxfs.h
index 6bc6c94..6b1e276 100644
--- a/include/libxfs.h
+++ b/include/libxfs.h
@@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ enum xfs_buf_flags_t { /* b_flags bits */
LIBXFS_B_STALE = 0x0004, /* buffer marked as invalid */
LIBXFS_B_UPTODATE = 0x0008, /* buffer is sync'd to disk */
LIBXFS_B_DISCONTIG = 0x0010, /* discontiguous buffer */
+ LIBXFS_B_UNCHECKED = 0x0020, /* needs verification */
};
#define XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL ((xfs_daddr_t) (-1LL))
--
1.9.0
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-24 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-24 5:01 [PATCH 0/9 V2] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-24 5:01 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-04-24 5:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] db: verify buffer on type change Dave Chinner
2014-04-25 5:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-24 5:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] repair: ensure prefetched buffers have CRCs validated Dave Chinner
2014-04-25 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-24 5:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] repair: detect and correct CRC errors in directory blocks Dave Chinner
2014-04-25 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-24 5:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] repair: detect CRC errors in AG headers Dave Chinner
2014-04-25 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-24 5:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] repair: report AG btree verifier errors Dave Chinner
2014-04-25 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-24 5:02 ` [PATCH 7/9] repair: remove more dirv1 leftovers Dave Chinner
2014-04-24 5:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] repair: handle remote symlink CRC errors Dave Chinner
2014-04-25 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-24 5:02 ` [PATCH 9/9] repair: detect and handle attribute tree " Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-04-28 21:04 [PATCH 0/9 v3] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-28 21:04 ` [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 [PATCH 0/9] xfs_db, xfs_repair: improve CRC error detection Dave Chinner
2014-04-15 8:24 ` [PATCH 1/9] db: don't claim unchecked CRCs are correct Dave Chinner
2014-04-21 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:13 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1398315722-20870-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).