From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4147F6B for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 12:05:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5509AC002 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EWuuyRTXl893WXbD for ; Fri, 02 May 2014 10:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s42H5nZ6005067 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 13:05:49 -0400 Received: from bfoster.bfoster ([10.18.41.237]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s42H5noS026670 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 13:05:49 -0400 From: Brian Foster Subject: [PATCH 0/5] xfstests: fixes for the free inode btree Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:13:57 -0400 Message-Id: <1399050842-19633-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi all, This series is a few xfstests fixes and addons for the finobt. Patch 1 fixes xfs/030 to work correctly on finobt-enabled filesystems. Patches 2 and 3 add support for finobt-oriented tests via require functions and repair filter updates. Patch 4 adds a new test for targeted repair of finobt filesystems. Patch 5 adds a stress test that creates/modifies a sparsely allocated set of inodes to effectively exercise the finobt in conjunction with an fsstress workload. xfs/010 runs very quickly. xfs/013 runs for 5-10 minutes on my smallish VM running against a single spindle, so I've been back and forth on whether it should be part of the auto group. Thoughts, reviews, flames appreciated... Brian Brian Foster (5): xfs/030: filter out extra repair noise for finobt enabled fs' xfstests: add _require_xfs_[mkfs_]finobt() checks for finobt tests xfstests: filter agno/ino repair output for finobt xfs/010: test repair for finobt corruption xfs/013: stress the free inode btree common/rc | 18 +++++++ common/repair | 2 + tests/xfs/010 | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/xfs/010.out | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++ tests/xfs/013 | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tests/xfs/013.out | 7 +++ tests/xfs/030 | 3 +- tests/xfs/group | 2 + 8 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100755 tests/xfs/010 create mode 100644 tests/xfs/010.out create mode 100755 tests/xfs/013 create mode 100644 tests/xfs/013.out -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs