From: "Jan Ťulák" <jan@tulak.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, XFS mail list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: symlink loop for /lib64/libhandle.so
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:31:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405009872.31068.22.camel@jtulak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140710134851.GA26652@infradead.org>
> On 10 Jul 2014, at 15:48, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:28:36AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
>>> If it not an intended behavior, I can try to find the source of the bug
>>> and make a patch (I'm new here :-).
>>
>> I can reproduce this on fedora rawhide via 'make install-qa.' This is
>> not intended behavior. I couldn't tell you what the problem is, but
>> patches are certainly welcome. :)
>
> This sounds like an fallout from the /lib -> /usr/lib symlink mess in
> Fedora. Might be worth taking a look at the specfile how Eric worked
> around that for the RPM..
Yes. I'm trying to find out what exactly is causing the difference. I
have tried to use the same tarball which is used in Eric's RPM and it
did the same thing as the git version, so it is not something that
would change since his last build.
So far It seems that if I add DIST_ROOT, PKG_ROOT_SBIN_DIR and
PKG_ROOT_LIB_DIR arguments to the "make install-qa" commandm it works OK and
the libhandle.so placed in PKG_ROOT_LIB_DIR points correctly to
libandle.so.1.
Does this makes some sense to you?
Jan Tulak
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-10 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 9:30 symlink loop for /lib64/libhandle.so Jan Ťulák
2014-07-09 13:28 ` Brian Foster
2014-07-10 13:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-10 16:31 ` Jan Ťulák [this message]
2014-07-10 16:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-07-11 10:47 ` Jan Ťulák
2014-07-14 8:04 ` Jan Ťulák
2014-07-14 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-15 10:28 ` Jan Ťulák
2014-07-15 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-18 6:07 ` Jan Ťulák
2014-08-11 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-13 19:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405009872.31068.22.camel@jtulak \
--to=jan@tulak.me \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox