From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix swapext ilock deadlock
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:12:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406787128-11897-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406787128-11897-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
xfs_swap_extents() holds the ilock over a call to
filemap_write_and_wait(), which can then try to write data and take
the ilock. That causes a self-deadlock.
Fix the deadlock and clean up the code by separating the locking
appropriately. Add a lockflags variable to track what locks we are
holding as we gain and drop them and cleanup the error handling to
always use "out_unlock" with the lockflags variable.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index bbc748a..3c60c43 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
int aforkblks = 0;
int taforkblks = 0;
__uint64_t tmp;
+ int lock_flags;
tempifp = kmem_alloc(sizeof(xfs_ifork_t), KM_MAYFAIL);
if (!tempifp) {
@@ -1641,13 +1642,13 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
}
/*
- * we have to do two separate lock calls here to keep lockdep
- * happy. If we try to get all the locks in one call, lock will
- * report false positives when we drop the ILOCK and regain them
- * below.
+ * Lock up the inodes against other IO and truncate to begin with.
+ * Then we can ensure the inodes are flushed and have no page cache
+ * safely. Once we have done this we can take the ilocks and do the rest
+ * of the checks.
*/
+ lock_flags = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, tip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
/* Verify that both files have the same format */
if ((ip->i_d.di_mode & S_IFMT) != (tip->i_d.di_mode & S_IFMT)) {
@@ -1666,6 +1667,9 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
goto out_unlock;
truncate_pagecache_range(VFS_I(tip), 0, -1);
+ xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
+
/* Verify O_DIRECT for ftmp */
if (VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping->nrpages) {
error = -EINVAL;
@@ -1720,6 +1724,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ lock_flags &= ~XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
/*
* There is a race condition here since we gave up the
@@ -1732,13 +1737,11 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_SWAPEXT);
error = xfs_trans_reserve(tp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_ichange, 0, 0);
- if (error) {
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0);
- goto out;
- }
+ if (error)
+ goto out_trans_cancel;
+
xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
/*
* Count the number of extended attribute blocks
@@ -1757,8 +1760,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
goto out_trans_cancel;
}
- xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, lock_flags);
+ xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, lock_flags);
/*
* Before we've swapped the forks, lets set the owners of the forks
@@ -1887,8 +1890,8 @@ out:
return error;
out_unlock:
- xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
+ xfs_iunlock(tip, lock_flags);
goto out;
out_trans_cancel:
--
2.0.0
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 6:12 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: extent swap fixes Dave Chinner
2014-07-31 6:12 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-07-31 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix swapext ilock deadlock Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-31 6:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: flush both inodes in xfs_swap_extents Dave Chinner
2014-07-31 17:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-31 23:02 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-01 12:44 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-02 3:19 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-02 11:24 ` Brian Foster
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-06 8:22 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: fix a couple of swap extent issues Dave Chinner
2014-06-06 8:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix swapext ilock deadlock Dave Chinner
2014-06-06 19:59 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1406787128-11897-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox