From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT writes
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:49:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1409226551-16570-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409226551-16570-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
xfs is using truncate_pagecache_range to invalidate the page cache
during DIO reads. This is different from the other filesystems who
only invalidate pages during DIO writes.
truncate_pagecache_range is meant to be used when we are freeing the
underlying data structs from disk, so it will zero any partial
ranges in the page. This means a DIO read can zero out part of the
page cache page, and it is possible the page will stay in cache.
buffered reads will find an up to date page with zeros instead of
the data actually on disk.
This patch fixes things by using invalidate_inode_pages2_range
instead. It preserves the page cache invalidation, but won't zero
any pages.
[dchinner: catch error and warn if it fails. Comment.]
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 076b170..827cfb2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -296,7 +296,16 @@ xfs_file_read_iter(
xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
return ret;
}
- truncate_pagecache_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, -1);
+
+ /*
+ * Invalidate whole pages. This can return an error if
+ * we fail to invalidate a page, but this should never
+ * happen on XFS. Warn if it does fail.
+ */
+ ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, -1);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
+ ret = 0;
}
xfs_rw_ilock_demote(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
}
--
2.0.0
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 11:49 [PATCH v2 0/7] xfs: invalidation and related fixes for v3.17-rc3 Dave Chinner
2014-08-28 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF Dave Chinner
2014-08-28 13:34 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-28 22:37 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-28 23:49 ` [PATCH 1/7 v2] " Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 12:13 ` Brian Foster
2014-08-29 0:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-29 0:53 ` Dave Chinner
2014-08-28 11:49 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-08-29 0:39 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT writes Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-28 11:49 ` [PATCH 3/7] " Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-28 11:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: use ranged writeback and invalidation for direct IO Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-28 11:49 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: don't log inode unless extent shift makes extent modifications Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-28 11:49 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: xfs_file_collapse_range is delalloc challenged Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-08-28 11:49 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: trim eofblocks before collapse range Dave Chinner
2014-08-29 0:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1409226551-16570-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox