From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs()
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:38:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425379119-3773-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425379119-3773-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it removes also security related
xattrs and sets S_NOSEC flag. Also should_remove_suid() tells something
else than whether file_remove_suid() call is necessary which leads to
bugs.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +-
fs/ceph/file.c | 2 +-
fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
fs/inode.c | 13 ++++++++-----
fs/ntfs/file.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +-
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index b78bbbac900d..c693dc2136e1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
- err = file_remove_suid(file);
+ err = file_remove_privs(file);
if (err) {
mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
index d533075a823d..493f293d433e 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/file.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
goto out;
iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
- err = file_remove_suid(file);
+ err = file_remove_privs(file);
if (err)
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index c01ec3bdcfd8..3e2ede73a3e3 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
goto out;
iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
- err = file_remove_suid(file);
+ err = file_remove_privs(file);
if (err)
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index be326ae7f880..bc5fe06b8784 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1672,7 +1672,11 @@ static int __remove_suid(struct dentry *dentry, int kill)
return notify_change(dentry, &newattrs, NULL);
}
-int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
+/*
+ * Remove special file priviledges (suid, security tags) when file is written
+ * to or truncated.
+ */
+int file_remove_privs(struct file *file)
{
struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
@@ -1699,7 +1703,7 @@ int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
return error;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_remove_suid);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_remove_privs);
/**
* file_update_time - update mtime and ctime time
@@ -1968,9 +1972,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_dio_done);
* inode is being instantiated). The reason for the cmpxchg() loop
* --- which wouldn't be necessary if all code paths which modify
* i_flags actually followed this rule, is that there is at least one
- * code path which doesn't today --- for example,
- * __generic_file_aio_write() calls file_remove_suid() without holding
- * i_mutex --- so we use cmpxchg() out of an abundance of caution.
+ * code path which doesn't today so we use cmpxchg() out of an abundance
+ * of caution.
*
* In the long run, i_mutex is overkill, and we should probably look
* at using the i_lock spinlock to protect i_flags, and then make sure
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
index 1da9b2d184dc..008a476558d3 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
@@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ static ssize_t ntfs_file_aio_write_nolock(struct kiocb *iocb,
goto out;
if (!count)
goto out;
- err = file_remove_suid(file);
+ err = file_remove_privs(file);
if (err)
goto out;
err = file_update_time(file);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index a2e1cb8a568b..fa81a43702ee 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ restart:
* setgid bits if the process is not being run by root. This keeps
* people from modifying setuid and setgid binaries.
*/
- return file_remove_suid(file);
+ return file_remove_privs(file);
}
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index b4d71b5e1ff2..676e431247bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2517,7 +2517,7 @@ extern struct inode *new_inode_pseudo(struct super_block *sb);
extern struct inode *new_inode(struct super_block *sb);
extern void free_inode_nonrcu(struct inode *inode);
extern int should_remove_suid(struct dentry *);
-extern int file_remove_suid(struct file *);
+extern int file_remove_privs(struct file *);
extern void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *, unsigned long hashval);
static inline void insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index ad7242043bdb..ac021d604b1e 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ ssize_t __generic_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
- err = file_remove_suid(file);
+ err = file_remove_privs(file);
if (err)
goto out;
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-03 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 10:38 [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks Jan Kara
2015-03-03 21:34 ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 16:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-14 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2015-05-04 23:13 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Dave Chinner
2015-05-05 7:56 ` Jan Kara
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] " Jan Kara
2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs() Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425379119-3773-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox