From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: remove nonblocking mode from xfs_vm_writepage
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:49:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439333388-16452-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439333388-16452-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Remove the nonblocking optimisation done for mapping lookups during
writeback. It's not clear that leaving a hole in the writeback range
just because we couldn't get a lock is really a win, as it makes us
do another small random IO later on rather than a large sequential
IO now.
As this gets inteh way of sane error handling later on, just remove
for the moment and we can re-introduce an equivalent optimisation in
future if we see problems due to extent map lock contention.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 19 +++----------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
index 4d5479d..b718156 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
@@ -285,8 +285,7 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
struct inode *inode,
loff_t offset,
struct xfs_bmbt_irec *imap,
- int type,
- int nonblocking)
+ int type)
{
struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
@@ -302,12 +301,7 @@ xfs_map_blocks(
if (type == XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN)
bmapi_flags |= XFS_BMAPI_IGSTATE;
- if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED)) {
- if (nonblocking)
- return -EAGAIN;
- xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
- }
-
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
ASSERT(ip->i_d.di_format != XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE ||
(ip->i_df.if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS));
ASSERT(offset <= mp->m_super->s_maxbytes);
@@ -958,7 +952,6 @@ xfs_do_writepage(
ssize_t len;
int err, uptodate = 1;
int count = 0;
- int nonblocking = 0;
trace_xfs_writepage(inode, page, 0, 0);
@@ -1057,9 +1050,6 @@ xfs_do_writepage(
bh = head = page_buffers(page);
offset = page_offset(page);
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
- nonblocking = 1;
-
do {
int new_ioend = 0;
@@ -1121,7 +1111,7 @@ xfs_do_writepage(
*/
new_ioend = 1;
err = xfs_map_blocks(inode, offset, &wpc->imap,
- wpc->io_type, nonblocking);
+ wpc->io_type);
if (err)
goto error;
wpc->imap_valid = xfs_imap_valid(inode, &wpc->imap,
@@ -1192,9 +1182,6 @@ error:
if (iohead)
xfs_cancel_ioend(iohead);
- if (err == -EAGAIN)
- goto redirty;
-
xfs_aops_discard_page(page);
ClearPageUptodate(page);
unlock_page(page);
--
2.5.0
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-11 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 22:49 [RFC, PATCH 0/8] xfs: get rid of xfs_cluster_write() Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages Dave Chinner
2015-08-12 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-13 1:32 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-13 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-14 1:53 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-15 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-15 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: io type needs to be part of the writepage context Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-12 7:27 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: remove nonblocking mode from xfs_vm_writepage Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: add ioend and iohead to xfs_writepage_ctx Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: writepage context needs to handle discontiguous page ranges Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: xfs_cluster_write is redundant Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: factor mapping out of xfs_do_writepage Dave Chinner
2015-08-11 22:49 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: bufferheads are not needed in ->writepage Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1439333388-16452-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox