From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfsprogs: Fix attr leaf block definition
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:11:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439457100-19977-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.com> (raw)
struct xfs_attr_leafblock contains 'entries' array which is declared
with size 1 altough it can in fact contain much more entries. Since this
array is followed by further struct members, gcc (at least in version
4.8.3) thinks that the array has the fixed size of 1 element and thus
optimizes away all accesses beyond the end of array resulting in
non-working code. In particular this problem was seen with
xfsprogs-3.1.8.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
---
include/xfs_da_format.h | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/xfs_da_format.h b/include/xfs_da_format.h
index 11f142078e12..f5e1d9df6a5c 100644
--- a/include/xfs_da_format.h
+++ b/include/xfs_da_format.h
@@ -1180,8 +1180,15 @@ typedef struct xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote {
typedef struct xfs_attr_leafblock {
xfs_attr_leaf_hdr_t hdr; /* constant-structure header block */
xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t entries[1]; /* sorted on key, not name */
- xfs_attr_leaf_name_local_t namelist; /* grows from bottom of buf */
- xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote_t valuelist; /* grows from bottom of buf */
+ /*
+ * The rest of the block contains the following structures after the
+ * leaf entries, growing from the bottom up. The variables are never
+ * referenced and definining them can actually make gcc optimize away
+ * accesses to the 'entries' array above index 0 so don't do that.
+ *
+ * xfs_attr_leaf_name_local_t namelist;
+ * xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote_t valuelist;
+ */
} xfs_attr_leafblock_t;
/*
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 9:11 Jan Kara [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-12 13:53 [PATCH] xfsprogs: Fix attr leaf block definition Jan Kara
2015-08-13 1:29 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-13 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-08-13 8:46 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1439457100-19977-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.com \
--to=jack@suse.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox