From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3E37F37 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:15:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F02F30407F for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:15:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Ins8VJN4MkbxpOSO (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:15:41 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: a reflink fix Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:13:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1452701629-11537-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: darrick.wong@oracle.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com This fixes the issues I saw with generic/168 over NFS. Turns out it wasn't anything specific to that particular test cases, we just needed a sufficiently aged refcount btree to trigger it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs