public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/7 v2] repair: big broken filesystems cause pain
Date: Fri,  5 Feb 2016 10:05:01 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454627108-19036-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)

Hi folks,

This is a followup to the original series I posted here:

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-12/msg00557.html

This addresses Brian's review comments for patch 3 - the da tree
node splitting doesn't use extra blocks for the root split - and
includes the patch I missed in the original patch posting to
reset the dirty buffer priority when it is looked up again (patch
7). Otherwise the patch series is unchanged.

-Dave.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 23:05 Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] repair: parallelise phase 7 Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  8:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-09  0:12     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] repair: parallelise uncertin inode processing in phase 3 Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  8:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] libxfs: directory node splitting does not have an extra block Dave Chinner
2016-02-05 14:20   ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08  9:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] libxfs: don't discard dirty buffers Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  9:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] libxfs: don't repeatedly shake unwritable buffers Dave Chinner
2016-02-08  9:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] libxfs: keep unflushable buffers off the cache MRUs Dave Chinner
2016-02-05 14:22   ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08 10:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 19:54     ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-04 23:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] libxfs: reset dirty buffer priority on lookup Dave Chinner
2016-02-05 14:23   ` Brian Foster
2016-02-08 10:08   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454627108-19036-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox