public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs_quota: fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails
Date: Tue,  2 Aug 2016 14:49:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470120540-15135-1-git-send-email-zlang@redhat.com> (raw)

After XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA feature has been merged into linux kernel and
xfsprogs, xfs_quota use Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA for report and dump, and
fall back to old XFS_GETQUOTA ioctl if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails.

But when XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails, xfs_quota print a warning as
"XFS_GETQUOTA: Invalid argument". That's due to kernel can't
recognize XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA ioctl and return EINVAL. At this time,
the warning is helpless, xfs_quota just need to fall back.

Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
---

Hi,

Both dump_file and report_mount have this problem, so I fix them
together.

xfstests xfs/299 can reproduce this bug in report_mount, the
newest xfs/106 can reproduce both(dump and report, hope I didn't
miss others:).

This patch checks "if cmd == XFS_GETQUOTA", but I'm thinking about
if we should check "if !(cmd == XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA && errno == EINVAL)"?

The first one don't print all errors from XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA, but the
second one only for EINVAL error.

So the question become should we:
1) fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails?
2) Or fall back silently if kernel has no XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA feature?

I think both of them make sense. What do you think?

Thanks,
Zorro


 quota/report.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/quota/report.c b/quota/report.c
index 59290e1..70220b4 100644
--- a/quota/report.c
+++ b/quota/report.c
@@ -90,8 +90,10 @@ dump_file(
 	else
 		cmd = XFS_GETQUOTA;
 
+	/* Fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails, warn on XFS_GETQUOTA */
 	if (xfsquotactl(cmd, dev, type, id, (void *)&d) < 0) {
-		if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH)
+		if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH &&
+		    cmd == XFS_GETQUOTA)
 			perror("XFS_GETQUOTA");
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -347,8 +349,10 @@ report_mount(
 	else
 		cmd = XFS_GETQUOTA;
 
+	/* Fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails, warn on XFS_GETQUOTA*/
 	if (xfsquotactl(cmd, dev, type, id, (void *)&d) < 0) {
-		if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH)
+		if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH &&
+		    cmd == XFS_GETQUOTA)
 			perror("XFS_GETQUOTA");
 		return 0;
 	}
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-02  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-02  6:49 Zorro Lang [this message]
2016-08-02 12:27 ` [PATCH] xfs_quota: fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 13:14   ` Zorro Lang
2016-08-02 15:54     ` Eric Sandeen
2016-08-02 15:06   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1470120540-15135-1-git-send-email-zlang@redhat.com \
    --to=zlang@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox