From: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: sandeen@redhat.com, Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs_quota: fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:49:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470120540-15135-1-git-send-email-zlang@redhat.com> (raw)
After XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA feature has been merged into linux kernel and
xfsprogs, xfs_quota use Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA for report and dump, and
fall back to old XFS_GETQUOTA ioctl if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails.
But when XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails, xfs_quota print a warning as
"XFS_GETQUOTA: Invalid argument". That's due to kernel can't
recognize XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA ioctl and return EINVAL. At this time,
the warning is helpless, xfs_quota just need to fall back.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
---
Hi,
Both dump_file and report_mount have this problem, so I fix them
together.
xfstests xfs/299 can reproduce this bug in report_mount, the
newest xfs/106 can reproduce both(dump and report, hope I didn't
miss others:).
This patch checks "if cmd == XFS_GETQUOTA", but I'm thinking about
if we should check "if !(cmd == XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA && errno == EINVAL)"?
The first one don't print all errors from XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA, but the
second one only for EINVAL error.
So the question become should we:
1) fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails?
2) Or fall back silently if kernel has no XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA feature?
I think both of them make sense. What do you think?
Thanks,
Zorro
quota/report.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/quota/report.c b/quota/report.c
index 59290e1..70220b4 100644
--- a/quota/report.c
+++ b/quota/report.c
@@ -90,8 +90,10 @@ dump_file(
else
cmd = XFS_GETQUOTA;
+ /* Fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails, warn on XFS_GETQUOTA */
if (xfsquotactl(cmd, dev, type, id, (void *)&d) < 0) {
- if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH)
+ if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH &&
+ cmd == XFS_GETQUOTA)
perror("XFS_GETQUOTA");
return 0;
}
@@ -347,8 +349,10 @@ report_mount(
else
cmd = XFS_GETQUOTA;
+ /* Fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails, warn on XFS_GETQUOTA*/
if (xfsquotactl(cmd, dev, type, id, (void *)&d) < 0) {
- if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH)
+ if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOSYS && errno != ESRCH &&
+ cmd == XFS_GETQUOTA)
perror("XFS_GETQUOTA");
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 6:49 Zorro Lang [this message]
2016-08-02 12:27 ` [PATCH] xfs_quota: fall back silently if XFS_GETNEXTQUOTA fails Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 13:14 ` Zorro Lang
2016-08-02 15:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-08-02 15:06 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470120540-15135-1-git-send-email-zlang@redhat.com \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox