From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] ovl: use vfs_copy_file_range() to copy up file data
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:43:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473856994-27463-5-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473856994-27463-1-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com>
Use vfs_copy_file_range() helper instead of calling do_splice_direct()
when copying up file data.
When copying up within the same fs, which supports copy_file_range(),
fs implementation can be more efficient then do_splice_direct().
vfs_copy_file_range() helper falls back to do_splice_direct() if
it cannot use the file system's copy_file_range() implementation.
A previous change added a vfs_clone_file_range() call before
the data copy loop, so this change is only effective for filesystems
that support copy_file_range() and *do not* support clone_file_range().
At the moment, there are no such filesystems in the kernel that
can be used as overlayfs upper, so I tested this change by disabling
the vfs_clone_file_range() call.
Tested correct behavior when lower and upper are on:
1. same ext4 (copy)
2. same xfs + reflink patches + mkfs.xfs (copy)
3. same xfs + reflink patches + mkfs.xfs -m reflink=1 (reflink)
4. different xfs + reflink patches + mkfs.xfs -m reflink=1 (copy)
For comparison, on my laptop, xfstest overlay/001 (copy up of large
sparse files) takes less than 1 second in the xfs reflink setup vs.
25 seconds on the rest of the setups.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 10 +++++-----
fs/read_write.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
index ba039f8..a6d6bac 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
@@ -146,7 +146,6 @@ static int ovl_copy_up_data(struct path *old, struct path *new, loff_t len)
/* Can't clone, so now we try to copy the data */
error = 0;
- /* FIXME: copy up sparse files efficiently */
while (len) {
size_t this_len = OVL_COPY_UP_CHUNK_SIZE;
long bytes;
@@ -159,15 +158,16 @@ static int ovl_copy_up_data(struct path *old, struct path *new, loff_t len)
break;
}
- bytes = do_splice_direct(old_file, &old_pos,
- new_file, &new_pos,
- this_len, SPLICE_F_MOVE);
+ bytes = vfs_copy_file_range(old_file, old_pos,
+ new_file, new_pos,
+ this_len, 0);
if (bytes <= 0) {
error = bytes;
break;
}
- WARN_ON(old_pos != new_pos);
+ old_pos += bytes;
+ new_pos += bytes;
len -= bytes;
}
out:
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 6975fe8..dfc083a 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -1515,6 +1515,7 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
file_out->f_op->copy_file_range)
ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out,
pos_out, len, flags);
+ /* FIXME: copy sparse file range efficiently */
if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
ret = do_splice_direct(file_in, &pos_in, file_out, &pos_out,
len > MAX_RW_COUNT ? MAX_RW_COUNT : len, 0);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 12:43 [PATCH v3 0/4] ovl: efficient copy up by reflink Amir Goldstein
2016-09-14 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] vfs: allow vfs_clone_file_range() across mount points Amir Goldstein
2016-09-14 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ovl: use vfs_clone_file_range() for copy up if possible Amir Goldstein
2016-09-21 15:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2016-09-21 17:01 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-21 18:29 ` Miklos Szeredi
2016-09-29 9:00 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-30 11:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2016-09-21 21:48 ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-21 21:57 ` Al Viro
2016-09-21 22:33 ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-22 2:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-09-22 2:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-14 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] vfs: allow vfs_copy_file_range() across file systems Amir Goldstein
2016-09-23 7:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-23 15:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-09-23 16:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-09-23 18:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-24 15:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-09-26 16:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-09-26 18:12 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-26 18:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-09-14 12:43 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2016-09-22 8:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ovl: use vfs_copy_file_range() to copy up file data Amir Goldstein
2016-09-22 14:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2016-09-22 15:44 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-22 17:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2016-09-19 18:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ovl: efficient copy up by reflink Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473856994-27463-5-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).