From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: xfs: fix inode uid/gid initialization
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:33:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487018008.3125.52.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170213194337.GA9852@infradead.org>
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 11:43 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:46:41AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I was debugging a creation failure using a vfs shifting patch set
> > and
> > discovered that xfs itself doesn't actually respect the superblock
> > namespace in a couple of places (these showed up as files with the
> > wrong ownership in my tests).
>
> Can you submit your test case to xfstests? I would be good to have
> testing for this in the regular test runs.
I will eventually ... I'm planning on adding a whole set. This issue
was just found by untarring a container image and then finding the ids
were wrong ...
> > The fix is to convert xfs away from hand
> > rolling inode_init_owner() and to use the i_uid/gid_read/write
> > functions.
>
> What about the various quota users of xfs_kuid_to_uid/gid in
> the create / symlink path?
Yes, looking at it again, xfs_qm_vop_dqalloc() is in terms of the
filesystem view, so current_fsuid(), which gives the uid in the kernel
view, needs to be transformed through the s_user_ns to get it into that
view.
Probably there needs to be an inode_fsuid/fsgid() (similar to i_uid/gid
_read())that returns the filesystem view of fsuid/fsgid
> I suspect they should be handle the same.
>
> Also with your patch the di_uid/gid fields should probably just
> go away as they are pointless now. Something like the patch below,
> although it still doesn't take care of the quota issues pointed out
> above.
Yes, I'll go for that.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 17:46 xfs: fix inode uid/gid initialization James Bottomley
2017-02-13 19:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-13 20:33 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2017-02-13 21:34 ` Dave Chinner
2017-02-14 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-14 6:27 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-14 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: add inode helpers for fsuid and fsgid James Bottomley
2017-02-14 7:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-02-14 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-14 16:09 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-15 2:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-02-16 15:43 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-17 1:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-02-17 17:12 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-20 4:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-02-14 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix inode uid/gid initialization James Bottomley
2017-02-14 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487018008.3125.52.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).