From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54690 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751203AbdFGNA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:00:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4097DC8F4 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bfoster.bfoster (dhcp-41-20.bos.redhat.com [10.18.41.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DD917A90 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:00:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Brian Foster Subject: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix spurious spin_is_locked() assert failures on non-smp kernels Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 09:00:55 -0400 Message-Id: <1496840455-65279-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org The 0-day kernel test robot reports assertion failures on !CONFIG_SMP kernels due to failed spin_is_locked() checks. As it turns out, spin_is_locked() is hardcoded to return zero on !CONFIG_SMP kernels and so this function cannot be relied on to verify spinlock state in this configuration. To avoid this problem, replace the associated asserts with lockdep variants that do the right thing regardless of kernel configuration. Drop the one assert that checks for an unlocked lock as there is no suitable lockdep variant for that case. This moves the spinlock checks from XFS debug code to lockdep, but generally provides the same level of protection. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Brian Foster --- Here's another version that uses lockdep calls as suggested by Christoph. Brian v2: - Use lockdep asserts instead of config check. - Drop !spin_is_locked() assert from inode initialization. v1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg07463.html fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 07b77b7..16d6a57 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static inline void __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec( struct xfs_buf *bp) { - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&bp->b_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&bp->b_lock); if (bp->b_state & XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT) { bp->b_state &= ~XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT; diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c index f61c84f8..990210f 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ xfs_inode_alloc( XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active); ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0); - ASSERT(!spin_is_locked(&ip->i_flags_lock)); ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip)); ASSERT(ip->i_ino == 0); @@ -190,7 +189,7 @@ xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag( { struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock); if (pag->pag_ici_reclaimable++) return; @@ -212,7 +211,7 @@ xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag( { struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock); if (--pag->pag_ici_reclaimable) return; -- 2.7.5