From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, tj@kernel.org, johannes.berg@intel.com,
oleg@redhat.com, amir73il@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, idryomov@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 2/3] lockdep: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt workqueue flush
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:38:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508319532-24655-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508319532-24655-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
The workqueue added manual acquisitions to catch deadlock cases.
Now crossrelease was introduced, some of those are redundant, since
wait_for_completion() already includes the acquisition for itself.
Removed it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 4 ++--
kernel/workqueue.c | 20 ++++----------------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index db6dc9d..1bef13e 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void destroy_delayed_work_on_stack(struct delayed_work *work) { }
\
__init_work((_work), _onstack); \
(_work)->data = (atomic_long_t) WORK_DATA_INIT(); \
- lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, #_work, &__key, 0); \
+ lockdep_init_map(&(_work)->lockdep_map, "(complete)"#_work, &__key, 0); \
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(_work)->entry); \
(_work)->func = (_func); \
} while (0)
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ enum {
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
const char *__lock_name; \
\
- __lock_name = #fmt#args; \
+ __lock_name = "(complete)"#fmt#args; \
\
__alloc_workqueue_key((fmt), (flags), (max_active), \
&__key, __lock_name, ##args); \
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index ab3c0dc..72f68b1 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2497,15 +2497,8 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
- /*
- * Explicitly init the crosslock for wq_barrier::done, make its lock
- * key a subkey of the corresponding work. As a result we won't
- * build a dependency between wq_barrier::done and unrelated work.
- */
- lockdep_init_map_crosslock((struct lockdep_map *)&barr->done.map,
- "(complete)wq_barr::done",
- target->lockdep_map.key, 1);
- __init_completion(&barr->done);
+ init_completion_with_map(&barr->done, &target->lockdep_map);
+
barr->task = current;
/*
@@ -2611,16 +2604,14 @@ void flush_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct wq_flusher this_flusher = {
.list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(this_flusher.list),
.flush_color = -1,
- .done = COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(this_flusher.done),
};
int next_color;
+ init_completion_with_map(&this_flusher.done, &wq->lockdep_map);
+
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return;
- lock_map_acquire(&wq->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&wq->lockdep_map);
-
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
/*
@@ -2883,9 +2874,6 @@ bool flush_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return false;
- lock_map_acquire(&work->lockdep_map);
- lock_map_release(&work->lockdep_map);
-
if (start_flush_work(work, &barr)) {
wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 9:38 Fix false positive by LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 9:38 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/3] completion: Add support for initializing completion with lockdep_map Byungchul Park
2017-10-19 23:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-20 6:14 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-20 6:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-20 19:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-21 2:23 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-22 14:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-23 2:08 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-25 7:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-25 11:49 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 9:38 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-10-18 9:38 ` [RESEND PATCH 3/3] lockdep: Assign a lock_class per gendisk used for wait_for_completion() Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 9:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-19 1:57 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-18 14:29 ` Fix false positive by LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE Bart Van Assche
2017-10-19 1:57 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-19 14:52 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508319532-24655-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).