From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m5H9JGZP003159 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:19:17 -0700 Received: from web34501.mail.mud.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id 0E05823D365 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web34501.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web34501.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.178.167]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id PMHBnWPdZr5xk2r6 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 02:20:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Reply-To: MusicMan529@yahoo.com Subject: Re: XFS mkfs/mount options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <153266.85236.qm@web34501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --- On Tue, 6/17/08, Dave Chinner wrote: > > For each of these kernel threads, only those on CPU #2 > are actually pulling notable load. Why is this? > > Because your disk interrupts are delivered to that CPU > only. Thank you! Tuning my IRQ delivery gave a noticeable speed-up. -- Mark "What better place to find oneself than on the streets of one's home village?" --Capt. Jean-Luc Picard, "Family"