From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 21:19:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <153905877511.10127.11218753138146239883.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153905876877.10127.12478254551500076698.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
In xrep_findroot_block, if we find a candidate root block with sibling
pointers or sibling blocks on the same tree level, we should not return
that block as a tree root because root blocks cannot have siblings.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
index 9f08dd9bf1d5..63786341ac2a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/repair.c
@@ -692,12 +692,13 @@ xrep_findroot_block(
struct xrep_find_ag_btree *fab,
uint64_t owner,
xfs_agblock_t agbno,
- bool *found_it)
+ bool *done_with_block)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = ri->sc->mp;
struct xfs_buf *bp;
struct xfs_btree_block *btblock;
xfs_daddr_t daddr;
+ int block_level;
int error;
daddr = XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR(mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno);
@@ -735,18 +736,52 @@ xrep_findroot_block(
goto out;
bp->b_ops = fab->buf_ops;
- /* Ignore this block if it's lower in the tree than we've seen. */
- if (fab->root != NULLAGBLOCK &&
- xfs_btree_get_level(btblock) < fab->height)
- goto out;
-
/* Make sure we pass the verifiers. */
bp->b_ops->verify_read(bp);
if (bp->b_error)
goto out;
- fab->root = agbno;
- fab->height = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock) + 1;
- *found_it = true;
+
+ /*
+ * This block passes the magic/uuid and verifier tests for this btree
+ * type. We don't need the caller to try the other tree types.
+ */
+ *done_with_block = true;
+
+ /*
+ * Compare this btree block's level to the height of the current
+ * candidate root block.
+ *
+ * If the level matches the root we found previously, throw away both
+ * blocks because there can't be two candidate roots.
+ *
+ * If level is lower in the tree than the root we found previously,
+ * ignore this block.
+ */
+ block_level = xfs_btree_get_level(btblock);
+ if (block_level + 1 == fab->height) {
+ fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
+ goto out;
+ } else if (block_level < fab->height) {
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This is the highest block in the tree that we've found so far.
+ * Update the btree height to reflect what we've learned from this
+ * block.
+ */
+ fab->height = block_level + 1;
+
+ /*
+ * If this block doesn't have sibling pointers, then it's the new root
+ * block candidate. Otherwise, the root will be found farther up the
+ * tree.
+ */
+ if (btblock->bb_u.s.bb_leftsib == cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK) &&
+ btblock->bb_u.s.bb_rightsib == cpu_to_be32(NULLAGBLOCK))
+ fab->root = agbno;
+ else
+ fab->root = NULLAGBLOCK;
trace_xrep_findroot_block(mp, ri->sc->sa.agno, agbno,
be32_to_cpu(btblock->bb_magic), fab->height - 1);
@@ -768,7 +803,7 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(
struct xrep_findroot *ri = priv;
struct xrep_find_ag_btree *fab;
xfs_agblock_t b;
- bool found_it;
+ bool done;
int error = 0;
/* Ignore anything that isn't AG metadata. */
@@ -777,16 +812,16 @@ xrep_findroot_rmap(
/* Otherwise scan each block + btree type. */
for (b = 0; b < rec->rm_blockcount; b++) {
- found_it = false;
+ done = false;
for (fab = ri->btree_info; fab->buf_ops; fab++) {
if (rec->rm_owner != fab->rmap_owner)
continue;
error = xrep_findroot_block(ri, fab,
rec->rm_owner, rec->rm_startblock + b,
- &found_it);
+ &done);
if (error)
return error;
- if (found_it)
+ if (done)
break;
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-09 4:19 [PATCH v4 0/3] xfs-4.20: scrub fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-09 4:19 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-10-09 4:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: always assign buffer verifiers when one is provided Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-09 4:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: fix buffer state management in xrep_findroot_block Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-09 12:16 ` Brian Foster
2018-10-09 16:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-09 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-05 0:47 [PATCH v3 0/3] xfs-4.20: scrub fixes Darrick J. Wong
2018-10-05 0:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: xrep_findroot_block should reject root blocks with siblings Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=153905877511.10127.11218753138146239883.stgit@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).