From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oA9Nq6rE179253 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:52:06 -0600 Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A07E81684E3 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 15:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dh17K2aHKaFUv7o4 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:53:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:53:28 +1100 (EST) From: Nathan Scott Message-ID: <1541591436.20791289346808565.JavaMail.root@acxmail-au2.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <20101109133948.GB2066@infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , Alex Elder Cc: Anibal Monsalve Salazar , xfs ----- "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:57:20PM +1100, nathans@aconex.com wrote: > > Update xfsprogs Debian maintainer annotation, bump version. > > ???? ?? > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott > > Looks good except for lots of weird chacaters which hopefully only > happen in the mail and not the actual patch. Yeah, dopey mail client. > Alex has various outstanding xfs_metadump updates, can you coordinate > the release with him, as it might be worth picking those up? No worries - do you have an ETA there Alex? cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs