From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: Allison Collins <allison.henderson@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/22] xfs: refactor xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 15:14:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159398727675.425236.8304381153768776467.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159398715269.425236.15910213189856396341.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Hoist the code that adjusts the incore quota reservation count
adjustments into a separate function, both to reduce the level of
indentation and also to reduce the amount of open-coded logic.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Collins <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
index 7f847cfba885..4439fe04f928 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
@@ -293,6 +293,37 @@ xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin(
}
}
+/* Apply dqtrx changes to the quota reservation counters. */
+static inline void
+xfs_apply_quota_reservation_deltas(
+ struct xfs_dquot_res *res,
+ uint64_t reserved,
+ int64_t res_used,
+ int64_t count_delta)
+{
+ if (reserved != 0) {
+ /*
+ * Subtle math here: If reserved > res_used (the normal case),
+ * we're simply subtracting the unused transaction quota
+ * reservation from the dquot reservation.
+ *
+ * If, however, res_used > reserved, then we have allocated
+ * more quota blocks than were reserved for the transaction.
+ * We must add that excess to the dquot reservation since it
+ * tracks (usage + resv) and by definition we didn't reserve
+ * that excess.
+ */
+ res->reserved -= abs(reserved - res_used);
+ } else if (count_delta != 0) {
+ /*
+ * These blks were never reserved, either inside a transaction
+ * or outside one (in a delayed allocation). Also, this isn't
+ * always a negative number since we sometimes deliberately
+ * skip quota reservations.
+ */
+ res->reserved += count_delta;
+ }
+}
/*
* Called by xfs_trans_commit() and similar in spirit to
@@ -327,6 +358,8 @@ xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas(
xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin(tp, qa);
for (i = 0; i < XFS_QM_TRANS_MAXDQS; i++) {
+ uint64_t blk_res_used;
+
qtrx = &qa[i];
/*
* The array of dquots is filled
@@ -396,71 +429,27 @@ xfs_trans_apply_dquot_deltas(
* In case of delayed allocations, there's no
* reservation that a transaction structure knows of.
*/
- if (qtrx->qt_blk_res != 0) {
- uint64_t blk_res_used = 0;
+ blk_res_used = max_t(int64_t, 0, qtrx->qt_bcount_delta);
+ xfs_apply_quota_reservation_deltas(&dqp->q_blk,
+ qtrx->qt_blk_res, blk_res_used,
+ qtrx->qt_bcount_delta);
- if (qtrx->qt_bcount_delta > 0)
- blk_res_used = qtrx->qt_bcount_delta;
-
- if (qtrx->qt_blk_res != blk_res_used) {
- if (qtrx->qt_blk_res > blk_res_used)
- dqp->q_blk.reserved -= (xfs_qcnt_t)
- (qtrx->qt_blk_res -
- blk_res_used);
- else
- dqp->q_blk.reserved -= (xfs_qcnt_t)
- (blk_res_used -
- qtrx->qt_blk_res);
- }
- } else {
- /*
- * These blks were never reserved, either inside
- * a transaction or outside one (in a delayed
- * allocation). Also, this isn't always a
- * negative number since we sometimes
- * deliberately skip quota reservations.
- */
- if (qtrx->qt_bcount_delta) {
- dqp->q_blk.reserved +=
- (xfs_qcnt_t)qtrx->qt_bcount_delta;
- }
- }
/*
* Adjust the RT reservation.
*/
- if (qtrx->qt_rtblk_res != 0) {
- if (qtrx->qt_rtblk_res != qtrx->qt_rtblk_res_used) {
- if (qtrx->qt_rtblk_res >
- qtrx->qt_rtblk_res_used)
- dqp->q_rtb.reserved -= (xfs_qcnt_t)
- (qtrx->qt_rtblk_res -
- qtrx->qt_rtblk_res_used);
- else
- dqp->q_rtb.reserved -= (xfs_qcnt_t)
- (qtrx->qt_rtblk_res_used -
- qtrx->qt_rtblk_res);
- }
- } else {
- if (qtrx->qt_rtbcount_delta)
- dqp->q_rtb.reserved +=
- (xfs_qcnt_t)qtrx->qt_rtbcount_delta;
- }
+ xfs_apply_quota_reservation_deltas(&dqp->q_rtb,
+ qtrx->qt_rtblk_res,
+ qtrx->qt_rtblk_res_used,
+ qtrx->qt_rtbcount_delta);
/*
* Adjust the inode reservation.
*/
- if (qtrx->qt_ino_res != 0) {
- ASSERT(qtrx->qt_ino_res >=
- qtrx->qt_ino_res_used);
- if (qtrx->qt_ino_res > qtrx->qt_ino_res_used)
- dqp->q_ino.reserved -= (xfs_qcnt_t)
- (qtrx->qt_ino_res -
- qtrx->qt_ino_res_used);
- } else {
- if (qtrx->qt_icount_delta)
- dqp->q_ino.reserved +=
- (xfs_qcnt_t)qtrx->qt_icount_delta;
- }
+ ASSERT(qtrx->qt_ino_res >= qtrx->qt_ino_res_used);
+ xfs_apply_quota_reservation_deltas(&dqp->q_ino,
+ qtrx->qt_ino_res,
+ qtrx->qt_ino_res_used,
+ qtrx->qt_icount_delta);
ASSERT(dqp->q_blk.reserved >= dqp->q_blk.count);
ASSERT(dqp->q_ino.reserved >= dqp->q_ino.count);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-05 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-05 22:12 [PATCH v2 00/22] xfs: remove xfs_disk_quot from incore dquot Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:12 ` [PATCH 01/22] xfs: clear XFS_DQ_FREEING if we can't lock the dquot buffer to flush Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:12 ` [PATCH 02/22] xfs: fix inode quota reservation checks Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:12 ` [PATCH 03/22] xfs: validate ondisk/incore dquot flags Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-09 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 04/22] xfs: split " Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-09 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-09 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 05/22] xfs: make XFS_DQUOT_CLUSTER_SIZE_FSB part of the ondisk format Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-09 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 06/22] xfs: stop using q_core.d_flags in the quota code Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 07/22] xfs: stop using q_core.d_id " Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 08/22] xfs: use a per-resource struct for incore dquot data Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 09/22] xfs: stop using q_core limits in the quota code Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 10/22] xfs: stop using q_core counters " Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 11/22] xfs: stop using q_core warning " Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 12/22] xfs: stop using q_core timers " Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:13 ` [PATCH 13/22] xfs: remove qcore from incore dquots Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 14/22] xfs: refactor default quota limits by resource Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 15/22] xfs: remove unnecessary arguments from quota adjust functions Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 16/22] xfs: refactor quota exceeded test Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 17/22] xfs: refactor xfs_qm_scall_setqlim Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 18/22] xfs: refactor xfs_trans_dqresv Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 20/22] xfs: assume the default quota limits are always set in xfs_qm_adjust_dqlimits Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 21/22] xfs: actually bump warning counts when we send warnings Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-05 22:14 ` [PATCH 22/22] xfs: add more dquot tracepoints Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159398727675.425236.8304381153768776467.stgit@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox