From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E25C8030 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 22:23:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7B8304032 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 20:23:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com (mx4-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.25]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3iE7uyXURsGPVPVq for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:23:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:23:26 -0500 (EST) From: CAI Qian Message-ID: <1601552351.8516567.1362371006444.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <220575861.7590457.1362129618880.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Subject: Re: possible fsync02() xfs slowness regression on power7 MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > > And this commit in 3.9-rc1: > > > > a1e16c2 xfs: limit speculative prealloc size on sparse files > > should fix the problem. Please confirm these commits are the cause > > and the fix respectively.... Confirmed this fixed the problem. I'd like to request this to be back-ported to stable-3.0, stable-3.4 and stable-3.8. What do you think? Thanks, CAI Qian _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs