From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566987F3F for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 02:12:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5750AC006 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:12:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id I94Q4Xyhv1TpOaKr (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:11:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Victor Stinner Subject: Re: Can you help me to investiage a soft lockup? Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1673046.E2St3OFZUd@smithers> In-Reply-To: <20141008212346.GS2301@dastard> References: <1211918248.8179166.1412774638265.JavaMail.zimbra@enovance.com> <734140413.8186921.1412777666412.JavaMail.zimbra@enovance.com> <20141008212346.GS2301@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, On Thursday 09 October 2014 08:23:46 Dave Chinner wrote: > You best bet would be to upgrade to a more recent kernel rather than > try to indentify and backport a bunch of fixes to an old kernel... I don't know the Linux kernel enough to feel confident to backport changes. So upgrading is the safest option. Eric Sandeen gave me the same advice. We will try to upgrade to Linux 3.13. Thanks for your reply. Victor _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs