From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7G1PqJq209966 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:25:52 -0500 Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2EA53CB2D65 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OJa3xV9vkfgxhaHa for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:25:59 +1000 (EST) From: Nathan Scott Message-ID: <1697333467.18161281921959476.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <20100814111513.GA8214@infradead.org> Subject: Re: xfsprogs Debian mantainaince MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: nathans@debian.org, anibal@debian.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com ----- "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > Hi Nathan, hi Anibal, > > if seen the constant flipping between native and non-native uploads > for the xfsprogs Debian packages between the two of you and it's > slightly annoying. I know Nathan likes maintaining the Debian > packages > in git, which also makes life for us XFS developers trying to build > debian packages a lot easier. > > What about a compromise? We'll add a debian- branches to the > xfsprogs-dev repository where we can track the exact packages > uploaded > to Debian, including the -2/-3 etc packages revisions that only get > uploaded to Debian, IMO, the -2 and -3 revisions are unnecessary and there's really no need for a separate branch ... if Anibal had a kernel.org account and merged changes in before uploading, there'd be no issue, I think - Anibal? It would make life simpler, for sure. > And one last request, any chance to get xfsprogs for -testing rebuilt > against libblkid now that util-linux-2.17 has finally made it into > testing? Beeing able to use blkid for alignment detection will be > very important so that XFS on Debian can deal with 4k sector disks > and hardware RAID arrays out of the box. Sure, I'll take a look at that for next upload. cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs