public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when trivally adding a new extent
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:14:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1740557.YaExq995uO@garuda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200817065307.GB23516@infradead.org>

On Monday 17 August 2020 12:23:07 PM IST Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 01:38:25PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> > When adding a new data extent (without modifying an inode's existing
> > extents) the extent count increases only by 1. This commit checks for
> > extent count overflow in such cases.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c       | 8 ++++++++
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h | 2 ++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c         | 5 +++++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c             | 8 +++++++-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c             | 5 +++++
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c           | 5 +++++
> >  6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > index 9c40d5971035..e64f645415b1 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > @@ -4527,6 +4527,14 @@ xfs_bmapi_convert_delalloc(
> >  		return error;
> >  
> >  	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> > +
> > +	if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
> 
> Should we add COW fork special casing to xfs_iext_count_may_overflow
> instead?

I agree. Making xfs_iext_count_may_overflow() to always return success in the
case of CoW fork would mean that the if condition can be removed and hence
makes the code more readable.

> 
> > +		error = xfs_iext_count_may_overflow(ip, whichfork,
> > +				XFS_IEXT_ADD_CNT);
> 
> I find the XFS_IEXT_ADD_CNT define very confusing.  An explicit 1 passed
> for a counter parameter makes a lot more sense to me.

The reason to do this was to consolidate the comment descriptions at one
place. For e.g. the comment for XFS_IEXT_DIR_MANIP_CNT (from "[PATCH V2 05/10]
xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing dir entries") is slightly
larger. Using constants (instead of macros) would mean that the same comment
has to be replicated across the 6 locations it is being used.

-- 
chandan




  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-17  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-14  8:08 [PATCH V2 00/10] Bail out if transaction can cause extent count to overflow Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] xfs: Add helper for checking per-inode extent count overflow Chandan Babu R
2020-08-17  6:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:44     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when trivally adding a new extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-17  6:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17  7:44     ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2020-08-27  8:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-27 13:51         ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-18 21:49     ` Dave Chinner
2020-08-18 21:57       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  4:43         ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when deleting an extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing xattrs Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when adding/removing dir entries Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when writing to unwritten extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when inserting a hole Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when moving extent from cow to data fork Chandan Babu R
2020-08-18 22:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-08-19  5:04     ` Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when remapping an extent Chandan Babu R
2020-08-14  8:08 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] xfs: Check for extent overflow when swapping extents Chandan Babu R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1740557.YaExq995uO@garuda \
    --to=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox