Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Lin Jiapeng <ljp1205831794@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	 jiapenglin@tencent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing issue with INO1_WRITTEN
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:05:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178841555975.1198521.11635969278161610368.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728071921.81156-1-jiapenglin@tencent.com>

On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:19:10 +0800, Lin Jiapeng wrote:
> When exchanging two full-file ranges, xmi_can_exchange_reflink_flags()
> can move the reflink inode flag from the file that currently has it to
> the other file, as long as exactly one side is marked.  This assumes
> that the file contents, and therefore all shared extents, are exchanged.
> 
> That assumption is not true when XFS_EXCHMAPS_INO1_WRITTEN is set.
> xfs_exchmaps_can_skip_mapping() can skip hole and unwritten mappings
> from file1, so an exchange can complete without moving every mapping
> that the earlier flag-swap decision accounted for.  In that case the
> post-operation cleanup can clear the reflink flag from an inode that
> still owns shared written extents.  Later writes then take the
> non-reflink write path and may update blocks that should still have
> been protected by CoW, which shows up as data corruption between
> reflink-related files.
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-next, thanks!

[1/1] xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing issue with INO1_WRITTEN
      commit: f3772e189ee8e37860c2bb365f6ac3517db937e9

Best regards,
-- 
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28  7:19 [PATCH v3] xfs: fix exchange-range reflink flag clearing issue with INO1_WRITTEN Lin Jiapeng
2026-08-03 13:22 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-08-31  8:03 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-09-03  6:05 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178841555975.1198521.11635969278161610368.b4-ty@kernel.org \
    --to=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jiapenglin@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljp1205831794@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox