From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: XFS and write barriers.
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:26:31 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17923.11463.459927.628762@notabene.brown> (raw)
Hi,
I have two concerns related to XFS and write barrier support that I'm
hoping can be resolved.
Firstly in xfs_mountfs_check_barriers in fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c,
it tests ....->queue->ordered to see if that is QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE.
If it is, then barriers are disabled.
I think this is a layering violation - xfs really has no business
looking that deeply into the device.
For dm and md devices, ->ordered is never used and so never set, so
xfs will never use barriers on those devices (as the default value is
0 or NONE). It is true that md and dm could set ->ordered to some
non-zero value just to please XFS, but that would be telling a lie and
there is no possible value that is relevant to a layered devices.
I think this test should just be removed and the xfs_barrier_test
should be the main mechanism for seeing if barriers work.
Secondly, if a barrier write fails due to EOPNOTSUPP, it should be
retried without the barrier (after possibly waiting for dependant
requests to complete). This is what other filesystems do, but I
cannot find the code in xfs which does this.
The approach taken by xfs_barrier_test seems to suggest that xfs does
do this... could someone please point me to the code ?
This is particularly important for md/raid1 as it is quite possible
that barriers will be supported at first, but after a failure and
different device on a different controller could be swapped in that
does not support barriers.
Thanks for your time,
NeilBrown
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-23 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-23 1:26 Neil Brown [this message]
2007-03-23 5:30 ` XFS and write barriers David Chinner
2007-03-23 7:49 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-25 4:17 ` David Chinner
2007-03-25 23:21 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-26 3:14 ` David Chinner
2007-03-26 4:27 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-26 9:04 ` David Chinner
2007-03-29 14:56 ` Martin Steigerwald
2007-03-29 15:18 ` David Chinner
2007-03-29 16:49 ` Martin Steigerwald
2007-03-23 9:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-25 3:51 ` David Chinner
2007-03-25 23:58 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-26 1:11 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-23 6:20 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-03-23 8:00 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-25 3:19 ` David Chinner
2007-03-26 0:01 ` Neil Brown
2007-03-26 3:58 ` David Chinner
2007-03-27 3:58 ` Timothy Shimmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17923.11463.459927.628762@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox