From: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
Cc: linux-raid maillist <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: INFO: task pdflush:393 blocked for more than 120 seconds. & Call traces ... (fwd)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:12:15 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18565.6095.988483.628391@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Mr. James W. Laferriere on Monday July 21
On Monday July 21, babydr@baby-dragons.com wrote:
> INFO: task pdflush:393 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> pdflush D c8209f80 4748 393 2
> f75e5e58 00000046 f7f7ad50 c8209f80 f7f7a8a0 f75e5e24 c014fc57 00000000
> f7f7a8a0 e5d0dd00 c8209f80 f75e4000 c0819e00 c8209f80 f7f7aaf4 f75e5e44
> 00000286 f75e5e80 f510de30 f75e5e58 c0142233 f510de00 f75e5e80 f510de30
> Call Trace:
> [<c014fc57>] ? mark_held_locks+0x67/0x80
> [<c0142233>] ? add_wait_queue+0x33/0x50
> [<c03a7f85>] xfs_buf_wait_unpin+0xb5/0xe0
> [<c0127a60>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
> [<c0127a60>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10
> [<c03a84fb>] xfs_buf_iorequest+0x4b/0x80
> [<c03adeee>] xfs_bdstrat_cb+0x3e/0x50
> [<c03a495c>] xfs_bwrite+0x5c/0xe0
> [<c039e941>] xfs_syncsub+0x121/0x2b0
> [<c018a43b>] ? lock_super+0x1b/0x20
> [<c018a43b>] ? lock_super+0x1b/0x20
> [<c039e1d8>] xfs_sync+0x48/0x70
> [<c03af833>] xfs_fs_write_super+0x23/0x30
> [<c018a80f>] sync_supers+0xaf/0xc0
Looks a lot like an XFS problem to me.
Or at least, XFS people would be able to interpret this stack the
best.
> [<c0169259>] wb_kupdate+0x29/0x100
> [<c016a0cc>] ? __pdflush+0xcc/0x1a0
> [<c016a0d2>] __pdflush+0xd2/0x1a0
> [<c016a1a0>] ? pdflush+0x0/0x40
> [<c016a1d1>] pdflush+0x31/0x40
> [<c0169230>] ? wb_kupdate+0x0/0x100
> [<c016a1a0>] ? pdflush+0x0/0x40
> [<c0141e2c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
> [<c0141dd0>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
> [<c0103d67>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> =======================
> 2 locks held by pdflush/393:
> #0: (&type->s_umount_key#17){----}, at: [<c018a7b2>] sync_supers+0x52/0xc0
> #1: (&type->s_lock_key#7){--..}, at: [<c018a43b>] lock_super+0x1b/0x20
>
> ...snip... Repeats of above message ad-infintum .
Hmm... I guess I clipped a bit too much for our XFS friends to know
the context.
bonnie is being run on an XFS filesystem on md/raid6. and it gets
this warning a lot and essentially hangs.
NeilBrown
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-21 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807210936410.7212@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
2008-07-21 23:12 ` Neil Brown [this message]
2008-07-21 23:43 ` INFO: task pdflush:393 blocked for more than 120 seconds. & Call traces ... (fwd) Mr. James W. Laferriere
2008-07-22 2:20 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-22 1:25 ` Timothy Shimmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18565.6095.988483.628391@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=babydr@baby-dragons.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox