From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nB22dSq8193484 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:39:28 -0600 Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 9C80AC43AE for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:39:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id F5vFw0AJ5CY0GNXH for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:39:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:39:51 +1100 (EST) From: Nathan Scott Message-ID: <1930278763.848341259721591215.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Does xfs automatically support acl without needing a mount/fstab option? MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: mlueck@lueckdatasystems.com Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com ----- "Michael Lueck" wrote: > Greetings- > > I am seeing directories on xfs partitions with the + at the end of the > perms list indicating there is an ACL associated with that particular > directory. > > With xfs, is it not necessary to specify in fstab that ACL support is > desired? Not necessary. > Is it automatically enabled? Yes, its always enabled. cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs