public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Eduardo Maiolino <cmaiolin@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop searching for free slots in an inode chunk when there are none
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 04:55:26 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1977631726.66215858.1501836926842.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170803223538.GB21024@dastard>

Hi Dave.


> > Add a way to stop the loop when a free slot is not found in the btree,
> > making the function to fall into the whole AG scan which will then, be
> > able to detect the corruption and shut the filesystem down.
> 
> That doesn't sound quite right. The initial scan and the restart
> loop are both limited to scanning search_distance records - we never
> search the entire tree except when it's really small (i..e less than
> 10-20 records (640-1280 inodes) depending on balance). If the
> pagino record to end of btree distance in both directions is shorter
> than the search distance for a given loop (i.e. less than 10 records
> from pagino to end-of-btree) then that is the only time a corrupted
> agi->freecount can cause this problem.
> 

I agree with you, but still, we are feasible to have this corruption happening,
and I've seen reports of users hitting it.


> IOWs, on production systems where there's more than a few hundred
> inodes (i.e. the vast majority of installations) a corrupted
> agi->freecount won't lead to a endless loop because search_distance
> will terminate the retry loop and we'll allocate a new inode.
> 
> To tell the truth, I'd much rather we just use the search distance
> to prevent endless looping than add a second method of limiting
> the search loop. i.e. don't reset search_distance when we restart
> the search loop at pagino.  That means even for small trees (<
> search_distance * 2 records) we'll retry when we get to the end of
> tree, but we'll still break out of the loop and allocate new inodes
> as soon as we hit the search distance limit.
> 

Sounds reasonable, I'll try that and send a V2,

Thank you!!

-- 
--Carlos

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-04  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-03 15:19 [PATCH] Stop searching for free slots in an inode chunk when there are none Carlos Maiolino
2017-08-03 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-04  8:55   ` Carlos Eduardo Maiolino [this message]
2017-08-04  9:36     ` Carlos Eduardo Maiolino
2017-08-04 23:17       ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-14 10:53 Carlos Maiolino
2017-08-14 11:36 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-08-14 22:48 ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1977631726.66215858.1501836926842.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=cmaiolin@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox