From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lilly.ping.de (lilly.ping.de [83.97.42.2]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k6HFqLDW003183 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:52:26 -0700 Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:48:31 +0200 From: Jochen Heuer Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! Message-ID: <20060717144831.GA28284@planetzork.ping.de> References: <20060717125216.GA15481@planetzork.ping.de> <1153146608.1218.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1153146608.1218.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , nathans@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:30:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Jochen, you didn't say whether or not the 2.6.18-rc2 locked up. I'm > assuming it did. But did it? Hi Steven, no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing with 2.6.18-rc2 so far. Best regards, Jochen