From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k6K7E0DW008069 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:14:12 -0700 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:13:10 +1000 From: Nathan Scott Subject: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Message-ID: <20060720171310.B1970528@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1153304468.3706.4.camel@localhost>; from lkml@metanurb.dk on Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:21:08PM +0200 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Kasper Sandberg , Justin Piszcz , Torsten Landschoff Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:21:08PM +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 08:57 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:29:41AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote: > > > > > > Jul 17 07:33:53 pulsar kernel: xfs_da_do_buf: bno 16777216 > > > Jul 17 07:33:53 pulsar kernel: dir: inode 54526538 > > > > I suspect you had some residual directory corruption from using the > > 2.6.17 XFS (which is known to have a lurking dir2 corruption issue, > > fixed in the latest -stable point release). Correction there - no -stable exists with this yet, I guess that'll be 2.6.17.7 once its out though. > what action do you suggest i do now? I've captured the state of this issue here, with options and ways to correct the problem: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 Hope this helps. cheers. -- Nathan