From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>,
Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>,
Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, ml@magog.se,
radsaq@gmail.com
Subject: Re: FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:52:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060721085230.F1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607201843020.2619@p34.internal.lan>; from jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:43:34PM -0400
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:43:34PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> p34:~# xfs_check -v /dev/md3
> xfs_check: out of memory
> p34:~#
>
> D'oh...
xfs_repair -n is another option, it has a cheaper (memory wise,
usually) checking algorithm.
> As long as it mounted ok with the patched kernel, should one be ok?
Not necessarily, no - mount will only read the root inode.
cheers.
--
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-20 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy>
2006-07-18 22:57 ` XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 8:08 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 22:56 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 10:29 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 10:21 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 12:43 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-19 15:25 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-07-19 22:59 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 7:13 ` FAQ updated (was Re: XFS breakage...) Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 7:58 ` Martin Steigerwald
2006-07-20 12:42 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2006-07-20 13:28 ` David Greaves
2006-07-20 16:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 22:14 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:18 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:24 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 22:43 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:52 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2006-07-20 22:55 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 22:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:00 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 23:10 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:12 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-07-20 23:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-07-20 23:19 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-20 15:13 ` Kevin Radloff
2006-07-20 16:51 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-31 16:25 ` Jan Kasprzak
2006-07-31 16:38 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-08-02 4:32 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-19 21:14 ` XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Torsten Landschoff
2006-07-19 23:09 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-22 16:27 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-23 23:01 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-25 20:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-07-25 23:10 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-28 17:01 ` Christian Kujau
2006-07-28 21:48 ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-29 20:22 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-07-29 22:28 ` David Chatterton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060721085230.F1990742@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@metanurb.dk \
--cc=ml@magog.se \
--cc=radsaq@gmail.com \
--cc=torsten@debian.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox