From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de (ms2.lichtvoll.de [194.150.191.235] (may be forged)) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k6L9QvDW031347 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:26:57 -0700 Received: from localhost (dslb-084-056-091-176.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.56.91.176]) by mondschein.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7397FA6B5 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:23:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: xfs FAQ update for write cache Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:26:26 +0200 References: <200607200602.k6K62Lsp32974694@snort.melbourne.sgi.com> <200607200955.36136.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <44C07168.60904@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <44C07168.60904@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607211126.26833.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Am Freitag 21 Juli 2006 08:17 schrieb Timothy Shimmin: > > A little feedback: lines are not wrapped in either Firefox or > > Konqueror (http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html). This is for the > > complete FAQ. It makes reading it difficult. > > I believe Nathan has fixed this now. Hello Timothy, yes. And it makes a huge difference in readability. > > While they are quite self-explanatory it might still help to make it > > absolutely clear what each log message mean. > > Ok. Thanks for updating the FAQ. The XFS FAQ has the best and the only coverage on write caching and write barrier! No mention of it in ext3, Reiser(fs) and JFS FAQs. BTW I can do a review of the complete FAQ. I have written lots of documentation and articles. Contact me when you are interested. But first I continue writing my article ;) Regards, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7