public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: jeremy@sgi.com
Subject: review: fix remount vs barrier options
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:28:07 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060721152807.D1998769@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)

Hi,

Jeremy has had me scratching my head for a few days trying to
figure out how the SCSI traces he's looking at can still show
signs of write barriers being issued to the device, despite a
"remount,nobarrier" having been done.

It finally clicked that we are not clearing the buffer flag
from a previously written log buffer, even though we'll no
longer set a new flag into a buffer (due to the mount flag
being cleared), so we _can_ still issue barrier writes when
remounted without barriers.

This was made more complicated by the way a freshly mounted
filesystem with 8 log buffers wouldn't show up the problem,
since we have to slowly cycle through the "clear" log buffers
before we see the bug.  This seems like the simplest fix...

(Hmmm, actually, I wonder if this will also resolve the quota
log I/O problem that was reported the other day too).

-- 
Nathan


Index: xfs-linux/xfs_log.c
===================================================================
--- xfs-linux.orig/xfs_log.c	2006-07-21 08:55:24.520992250 +1000
+++ xfs-linux/xfs_log.c	2006-07-21 09:47:08.429216000 +1000
@@ -1471,6 +1471,8 @@ xlog_sync(xlog_t		*log,
 	 */
 	if (log->l_mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER)
 		XFS_BUF_ORDERED(bp);
+	else
+		XFS_BUF_UNORDERED(bp);
 
 	ASSERT(XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp) <= log->l_logBBsize-1);
 	ASSERT(XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp) + BTOBB(count) <= log->l_logBBsize);
@@ -1503,6 +1505,8 @@ xlog_sync(xlog_t		*log,
 		XFS_BUF_ASYNC(bp);
 		if (log->l_mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BARRIER)
 			XFS_BUF_ORDERED(bp);
+		else
+			XFS_BUF_UNORDERED(bp);
 		dptr = XFS_BUF_PTR(bp);
 		/*
 		 * Bump the cycle numbers at the start of each block

             reply	other threads:[~2006-07-21  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-21  5:28 Nathan Scott [this message]
2006-07-21  6:25 ` review: fix remount vs barrier options Timothy Shimmin
2006-07-23 19:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-24  0:01   ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-24  1:27     ` Nathan Scott
2006-07-25  9:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-25 22:21         ` Nathan Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060721152807.D1998769@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com \
    --to=nathans@sgi.com \
    --cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox