From: Jochen Heuer <jogi-kernel@planetzork.ping.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
nathans@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:53:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060721225304.GA12184@planetzork.ping.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060717144831.GA28284@planetzork.ping.de>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:48:31PM +0200, Jochen Heuer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:30:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > Jochen, you didn't say whether or not the 2.6.18-rc2 locked up. I'm
> > assuming it did. But did it?
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing
> with 2.6.18-rc2 so far.
Hi,
well, it locks up with 2.6.18-rc2 too. Three times today. And always during
webbrowsing ... What's so special about it? Could it be because it accesses
network and disk at the same time?
The system has been pretty busy compiling the last days because I did setup a
new Gentoo system in chroot environment. No problem whatsoever. I did run
2 x mprime for a day and also no problem.
Is there anything I can test? Disable irq balancing? Disabling preemption did
not help. Disabling IO-APIC? What can I do to help isolate the problem because
it really is annoying and I don't like pushing the reset button. Because if the
system locks up *really* nothing works. The screen is frozen, no mouse, no
keyboard, no sys-rq, no network ... nothing.
Thanks for your help and best regards,
Jochen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-21 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060717125216.GA15481@planetzork.ping.de>
[not found] ` <1153146608.1218.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2006-07-17 14:48 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1! Jochen Heuer
2006-07-21 22:53 ` Jochen Heuer [this message]
2006-07-21 22:58 ` Jochen Heuer
2009-02-11 7:16 raksac
2009-02-11 9:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-02-11 23:33 ` raksac
2009-02-11 23:36 ` Justin Piszcz
2009-02-12 9:22 ` raksac
2009-02-12 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-12 21:59 ` raksac
2009-02-12 22:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-12 22:16 ` raksac
2009-02-13 4:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-19 8:04 ` raksac
2009-02-13 9:32 ` Michael Monnerie
2009-02-11 23:34 ` raksac
2009-02-12 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-12 21:55 ` raksac
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-11 7:57 Rakesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060721225304.GA12184@planetzork.ping.de \
--to=jogi-kernel@planetzork.ping.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox