From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k6PNBZDW025094 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:11:47 -0700 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:10:50 +1000 From: Nathan Scott Subject: Re: XFS breakage in 2.6.18-rc1 Message-ID: <20060726091050.D2118045@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060718222941.GA3801@stargate.galaxy> <20060719085731.C1935136@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20060724090138.C2083275@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de on Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:16:10PM +0200 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Now that 2.6.17.7 is finally there, I am going to eyeball my XFS > filesystems. Does xfsprogs 2.7.11 suffice? Sure, except for the repair issue which Barry is working on (see the FAQ). > Please update the XFS FAQ about this problem (and the solution, for > others that did not read LKML), thanks! That was done last week. You shoulda read it before sending this, and saved me some time replying. ;) cheers. -- Nathan