From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.wurtel.net (xs.wurtel.net [83.68.3.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k7EFuEDW032764 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:56:14 -0700 Received: from wurtel ([192.168.1.1] helo=wurtel-ws.wurtel.net) by mx.wurtel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GCemm-00079Z-00 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:55:28 +0200 Received: from paul by wurtel-ws.wurtel.net with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GCeml-0002oi-Q7 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:55:27 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:55:27 +0200 From: Paul Slootman Subject: Re: cache_purge: shake on cache 0x5880a0 left 8 nodes!? Message-ID: <20060814155527.GA10314@wurtel.net> References: <20060810164222.GA16332@wurtel.net> <20060814145927.GA28940@tuatara.stupidest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060814145927.GA28940@tuatara.stupidest.org> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon 14 Aug 2006, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:42:22PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > empty data block 10 in directory inode 1343747104: junking block > > empty data block 11 in directory inode 1343747104: junking block > > empty data block 12 in directory inode 1343747104: junking block > > free block 16777216 entry 10 for directory ino 1343747104 bad > > rebuilding directory inode 1343747104 > > do subsequent xfs_repair runs go silent? if not then you've probably > hit a case where it's leaving something icky behind and you have to > manually poke it using xfs_db (i had this myself) No, these particular messages didn't reoccur, although I've been having a lot of trouble with that filesystem (see my other message today). Paul Slootman