From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k7GNkbDW001877 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:46:50 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 09:45:42 +1000 From: Nathan Scott Subject: Re: review: fsblock zero - don't panic Message-ID: <20060817094542.D2787212@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060810155851.C2591606@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20060811032626.GF50254148@melbourne.sgi.com> <20060816142800.D2762042@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1155713014.7103.345.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1155713014.7103.345.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from stewart@flamingspork.com on Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:23:33PM +0800 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Stewart Smith Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:23:33PM +0800, Stewart Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 14:28 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > + error = EFSCORRUPTED; > > should this be XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED) ? *nod*, will do, thanks. cheers. -- Nathan