From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.osdl.org (smtp.osdl.org [65.172.181.4]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k7V8tEDW013154 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:55:57 -0700 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 01:54:30 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: kernel BUG in __xfs_get_blocks at fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c:1293! Message-Id: <20060831015430.6df0d8ba.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060831081726.GV5737019@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <44F67847.6030307@cn.ibm.com> <20060831074742.GD807830@melbourne.sgi.com> <44F6979C.4070309@cn.ibm.com> <20060831081726.GV5737019@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: Yao Fei Zhu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:17:26 +1000 David Chinner wrote: > > BTW, I have CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES enabled. > > But that might be a good place to start. Can you see if you can > reproduce the problem without this config option set? It would be useful to compare the compiler warning output for 64k pages versus that for smaller-pages. Several quite worrisome-looking warnings are emitted from various parts of the kernel with 64k pages. Related to arithmetic on short types.