From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k7V3KADW009025 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:20:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:19:02 +1000 From: Nathan Scott Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix i_state of inode is changed after the inode is freed [try #2] Message-ID: <20060831131902.H3208450@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060824171653.C3003989@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20060831114423m-saito@mail.aom.tnes.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060831114423m-saito@mail.aom.tnes.nec.co.jp>; from m-saito@tnes.nec.co.jp on Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:44:23AM +0900 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Masayuki Saito Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:44:23AM +0900, Masayuki Saito wrote: > Hi, Nathan > > Are the patches going to be merged? Yep, they're queued up for 2.6.19. Since it was a race found only on testing with a ramdisk (iirc) it didn't really seem to me like they needed to be rushed through for a 2.6.18-rc. The race has also been there for the entire lifetime of the Linux XFS port... so, not urgent (and not risk free either). cheers. -- Nathan