* Kernel Ooops
@ 2006-09-05 11:27 Chris Seufert
2006-09-05 22:30 ` Nathan Scott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Seufert @ 2006-09-05 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
I have had this one before, and i had assumed it had been fixed.
System seems very stable running ext3, so i dont 'think' its hardware
related, but i am begining to wonder.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000a8 RIP:
[<ffffffff8031dd16>] xfs_btree_init_cursor+0x48/0x1bd
PGD 2cdb5067 PUD 2cd95067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
last sysfs file: /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:08.0/host4/target4:0:0/4:0:0:0/type
CPU 0
Modules linked in: ipv6 thermal fan button processor ac battery
parport_pc parport floppy pcspkr k8_edac edac_mc generic amd74xx
ehci_hcd ohci_hcd i2c_nforce2 i2c_core ide_scsi tg3 e100 mii psmouse
ide_generic ide_disk ide_cd ide_core rtc unix
Pid: 3986, comm: proftpd Not tainted 2.6.18-rc2-mm1 #4
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8031dd16>] [<ffffffff8031dd16>]
xfs_btree_init_cursor+0x48/0x1bd
RSP: 0018:ffff81002cd37a38 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffff81002c99fb00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff81002c99fb00
RDX: 0000001000020250 RSI: 0000000000000250 RDI: ffff81002c99fbc0
RBP: ffff81003e2ab800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff81002c846718
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002
FS: 00002af412fbf6d0(0000) GS:ffffffff8060c000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000000000000a8 CR3: 000000002cd6f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process proftpd (pid: 3986, threadinfo ffff81002cd36000, task ffff81003d5947a0)
Stack: ffff81003e2ab800 0000000000000000 ffff81002c846718 0000000000000001
ffff81002c846718 0000000000000001 0000000000000482 ffffffff80306f3b
0000000000000000 ffff81003ee08f40 0000000200000000 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff80306f3b>] xfs_free_ag_extent+0x4e/0x67f
[<ffffffff8025449d>] cache_alloc_refill+0xdb/0x1f6
[<ffffffff8025bec9>] __down_read+0x12/0x9a
[<ffffffff80308995>] xfs_free_extent+0xb5/0xd3
[<ffffffff80344338>] xfs_trans_get_efd+0x21/0x29
[<ffffffff803156f8>] xfs_bmap_finish+0xf0/0x169
[<ffffffff80341949>] xfs_rename+0x89e/0xa98
[<ffffffff803535fb>] xfs_vn_rename+0x2c/0x6f
[<ffffffff8020da8d>] link_path_walk+0xd3/0xe5
[<ffffffff8021ef6c>] __up_read+0x13/0xa9
[<ffffffff8032f8eb>] xfs_iunlock+0x57/0x79
[<ffffffff8021ef6c>] __up_read+0x13/0xa9
[<ffffffff8032f8eb>] xfs_iunlock+0x57/0x79
[<ffffffff80226ba5>] vfs_rename+0x252/0x3a5
[<ffffffff80231f88>] sys_renameat+0x180/0x1f9
[<ffffffff80220425>] sys_newstat+0x19/0x31
[<ffffffff80254f36>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
Code: 49 8b 95 a8 00 00 00 89 d8 8b 44 82 1c 0f c8 e9 85 00 00 00
RIP [<ffffffff8031dd16>] xfs_btree_init_cursor+0x48/0x1bd
RSP <ffff81002cd37a38>
CR2: 00000000000000a8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel Ooops
2006-09-05 11:27 Kernel Ooops Chris Seufert
@ 2006-09-05 22:30 ` Nathan Scott
2006-09-05 23:30 ` Chris Seufert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Scott @ 2006-09-05 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Seufert; +Cc: xfs
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:27:04PM +1000, Chris Seufert wrote:
> I have had this one before, and i had assumed it had been fixed.
>
> System seems very stable running ext3, so i dont 'think' its hardware
> related, but i am begining to wonder.
This is fixed, what kernel version are you using? (it was fixed
in -rc5/6 IIRC).
> RIP [<ffffffff8031dd16>] xfs_btree_init_cursor+0x48/0x1bd
cheers.
--
Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel Ooops
2006-09-05 22:30 ` Nathan Scott
@ 2006-09-05 23:30 ` Chris Seufert
2006-09-05 23:31 ` Nathan Scott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Seufert @ 2006-09-05 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathan Scott; +Cc: xfs
Just installed -rc5, all seems well.
Should i be running a fsck after these types of errors?
On 9/6/06, Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:27:04PM +1000, Chris Seufert wrote:
> > I have had this one before, and i had assumed it had been fixed.
> >
> > System seems very stable running ext3, so i dont 'think' its hardware
> > related, but i am begining to wonder.
>
> This is fixed, what kernel version are you using? (it was fixed
> in -rc5/6 IIRC).
>
> > RIP [<ffffffff8031dd16>] xfs_btree_init_cursor+0x48/0x1bd
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel Ooops
2006-09-05 23:30 ` Chris Seufert
@ 2006-09-05 23:31 ` Nathan Scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Scott @ 2006-09-05 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Seufert; +Cc: xfs
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:30:25AM +1000, Chris Seufert wrote:
> Just installed -rc5, all seems well.
Great.
> Should i be running a fsck after these types of errors?
Its not needed, no.
cheers.
--
Nathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-05 23:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-09-05 11:27 Kernel Ooops Chris Seufert
2006-09-05 22:30 ` Nathan Scott
2006-09-05 23:30 ` Chris Seufert
2006-09-05 23:31 ` Nathan Scott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox